User talk:Ibrarr

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 14:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ibrarr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 14:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Ibrarr/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David.moreno72 14:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:01, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibrarr (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand I was blocked for promotional editing and not complying with the paid-contribution disclosure requirements. I have now read the Terms of Use and the policies at WP:PAID and WP:COI. I have added a disclosure on my user page. If unblocked, I will not directly edit articles where I have a financial connection. I will propose any changes via edit requests on article talk pages using the appropriate templates, and I will submit any new article through WP:AfC. I will focus my editing on unrelated topics and follow community guidance. Ibrarr (talk) 14:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You claim you have added your disclosure to your user page, but no such disclosure was made. You also indicate you plan to avoid writing about subjects for which you have a conflict of interest, but contradict that by stating that you do plan to write about subjects for which you have a conflict of interest, only that you'll suggest edits rather than editing directly. Frankly, I suspect you abused an AI chatbot to make this request. If so, that was a terrible idea. Yamla (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have a connection to the topic(s) above. I will propose edits on talk pages using {{request edit}} and will not directly edit connected articles.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ibrarr (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I accept that I broke the rules before by using promotional language and failing to disclose paid contributions. I have now disclosed my connection: . If unblocked, I will not directly edit any article where I have a financial connection. I intend to work on a new draft about Flexioffices only through WP:AfC. Any suggested changes will be made via {{request edit}} on talk pages and supported by independent, reliable sources. I will not repeat the previous breaches and accept an immediate re-block if I do. Ibrarr (talk) 15:21, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I accept that I broke the rules before by using promotional language and failing to disclose paid contributions. I have now disclosed my connection: __NOINDEX__<table class="plainlinks tmbox tmbox-notice" role="presentation" style="text-align: left;"><tr><td class="mbox-image">[[File:Dollar sign in circle cleaned (PD version).svg|50px]]</td><td class="mbox-text">This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's [[wmf:Terms of Use#4. Refraining from Certain Activities|Terms of Use]], discloses that they have been paid by Vulkan Creative on behalf of Flexioffices for their contributions to Wikipedia.</td></tr></table>[[Category:Paid contributors]]. If unblocked, I will not directly edit any article where I have a financial connection. I intend to work on a new draft about Flexioffices only through [[WP:AfC]]. Any suggested changes will be made via {{request edit}} on talk pages and supported by independent, reliable sources. I will not repeat the previous breaches and accept an immediate re-block if I do. [[User:Ibrarr|Ibrarr]] ([[User talk:Ibrarr#top|talk]]) 15:21, 11 September 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I accept that I broke the rules before by using promotional language and failing to disclose paid contributions. I have now disclosed my connection: __NOINDEX__<table class="plainlinks tmbox tmbox-notice" role="presentation" style="text-align: left;"><tr><td class="mbox-image">[[File:Dollar sign in circle cleaned (PD version).svg|50px]]</td><td class="mbox-text">This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's [[wmf:Terms of Use#4. Refraining from Certain Activities|Terms of Use]], discloses that they have been paid by Vulkan Creative on behalf of Flexioffices for their contributions to Wikipedia.</td></tr></table>[[Category:Paid contributors]]. If unblocked, I will not directly edit any article where I have a financial connection. I intend to work on a new draft about Flexioffices only through [[WP:AfC]]. Any suggested changes will be made via {{request edit}} on talk pages and supported by independent, reliable sources. I will not repeat the previous breaches and accept an immediate re-block if I do. [[User:Ibrarr|Ibrarr]] ([[User talk:Ibrarr#top|talk]]) 15:21, 11 September 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I accept that I broke the rules before by using promotional language and failing to disclose paid contributions. I have now disclosed my connection: __NOINDEX__<table class="plainlinks tmbox tmbox-notice" role="presentation" style="text-align: left;"><tr><td class="mbox-image">[[File:Dollar sign in circle cleaned (PD version).svg|50px]]</td><td class="mbox-text">This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's [[wmf:Terms of Use#4. Refraining from Certain Activities|Terms of Use]], discloses that they have been paid by Vulkan Creative on behalf of Flexioffices for their contributions to Wikipedia.</td></tr></table>[[Category:Paid contributors]]. If unblocked, I will not directly edit any article where I have a financial connection. I intend to work on a new draft about Flexioffices only through [[WP:AfC]]. Any suggested changes will be made via {{request edit}} on talk pages and supported by independent, reliable sources. I will not repeat the previous breaches and accept an immediate re-block if I do. [[User:Ibrarr|Ibrarr]] ([[User talk:Ibrarr#top|talk]]) 15:21, 11 September 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi there! I've gone ahead and added the payment disclosure to your user page. That said, please note that Wikipedia is not a directory. As such, existence does not mean companies are eligible for inclusion. Rather, we determine which topics deserve Wikipedia based on our notablity guidelines. Notability is established by having significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Before beginning a draft about your company, check to see if you can find at least three good sources. Otherwise, it is highly unlikely the company is notable. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:39, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Can you let us know if there are other topics you're interested in editing? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]