User talk:HumanxAnthro

User talk:HumanxAnthro/Archive 2

Your GA nomination of Making Memories (Rush song)

[edit]

The article Making Memories (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Making Memories (Rush song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Making Memories (Rush song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Second Nature (Rush song)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Second Nature (Rush song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Second Nature (Rush song)

[edit]

The article Second Nature (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Second Nature (Rush song) and Talk:Second Nature (Rush song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Didacts and Narpets

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Didacts and Narpets you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Didacts and Narpets

[edit]

The article Didacts and Narpets you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Didacts and Narpets and Talk:Didacts and Narpets/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Second Nature (Rush song)

[edit]

The article Second Nature (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Second Nature (Rush song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Second Nature (Rush song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Didacts and Narpets

[edit]

The article Didacts and Narpets you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Didacts and Narpets for comments about the article, and Talk:Didacts and Narpets/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Before and After (Rush song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Before and After (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Before and After (Rush song) and Talk:Before and After (Rush song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Before and After (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Before and After (Rush song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Before and After (Rush song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]