User talk:Glowingmushroom
This is Glowingmushroom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Coto Japanese Academy (August 4)
[edit]
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coto Japanese Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Glowingmushroom!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 04:16, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
|
Coto Japanese Academy Draft
[edit]You’ve made a great start on this article. I’m not going to formally review it just yet, because it would not succeed in its current form. It needs some independent secondary sources as references - the textbook source is a primary source, and so doesn’t apply, and the other sources used are not independent. Ideally the sources would be from some sort of media coverage of the academy…
Good luck and keep up the good work. I’ll check back in a week or two if it still hasn’t been reviewed, to see how you’re getting on 👍 Absurdum4242 (talk) 08:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your detailed feedback! Will take it into account and look for the right sources. Glowingmushroom (talk) 05:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)