User talk:Girishef

Welcome!

Hello, Girishef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Adakiko (talk) 07:52, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

Should be retained. See Keep dead links. Thank you Adakiko (talk)

Notable people

Should meet wp:notability (people) and have a Wikipedia article. See wp:Articles for creation. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 07:54, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Satish Jha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Satish Jha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:49, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OLPC India (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject seems notable, but sourcing is a major issue; the draft largely relies on a single source that leads to another wiki, which is user-content and generally not allowed. Five references also aren't enough for a draft of this size. Please add more substantial, independent and reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OLPC India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NeoGaze (talk) 11:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, Girishef, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Giriship (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 05:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Satish Jha, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Girishef, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Girishef|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Wikishovel (talk) 12:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Girishef. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Satish Jha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Girishef. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sohom (talk) 14:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Girishef (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator,

I understand that my account *Girishef* has been blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. I sincerely apologize for this situation. I was unaware that having or occasionally using more than one account — in my case *Girishef* and *Giriship* — could be considered a violation of Wikipedia’s policy on multiple accounts.

There was never any intention to deceive, evade restrictions, or influence discussions. I now clearly understand the policy and the importance of maintaining transparency and using only one account for all contributions. I take full responsibility for the misunderstanding and assure you that it will not happen again.

I truly appreciate the incredible work that Wikipedia and its volunteers do to make knowledge freely available to all. I would be grateful for the opportunity to continue contributing positively to this mission under a single compliant account.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Kind regards,

Girish (User: Girishef) Girishef (talk) 05:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was AI generated(93% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you directly. An AI cannot tell us what is inside your mind. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 08:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Satish Jha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Satish Jha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and sockpuppetry and probable undisclosed paid editing.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Girishef (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Dear Admin, :A few months ago, I started using Wikipedia as a volunteer . Initially, I have created an account with username giriship that I was using once in a while, later I thought of using Wikipedia more. So, created another account with username girishef and started using it extensively. I have my both account on different instances of google chromes. :I accidently replied on talk page with giriship account that page was initially created by girishef with most of the comment by girishef. :I was unaware of the policies of Wikipedia (as I am a relatively a new user), I know the importance of policy and compliance for the overall trust and faith of common people in the organization. :I acknowledge my mistake. I assure you that this event won't occur next time. I want to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Kindly allow me at least one user account to use. "

Decline reason:

Declined; user is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 09:04, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Will you commit to restricting yourself to only a single account? What about your undisclosed conflict of interest (WP:COI)? --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have started contributing a little on Wikipedia with the intent of learning and contributing to the current educational technology landscape. Thank you for informing me about the conflict of interest which I was not aware of until now and since you pointed out I will be mindful of this.

Thank you Girishef (talk) 13:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This does not answer the questions I asked you. --Yamla (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]