User talk:Filmbuff2025

Welcome!

Hi Filmbuff2025! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 22:05, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Masters and Vices moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Masters and Vices. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY2008 00:43, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bovineboy2008,

Thank you for your message. Please could you kindly explain your rationale for the following:

·        Why you have removed the accolades section and its subsequent references from the Masters and Vices Wikipedia page? Surely the film obtaining over 16 awards would contribute to its notability?

·        Why you have removed the film’s official iMDB citation? This is a public page which serves as a reference point for the film’s tech specs, production timeline and cast order that is regularly monitored by iMDb staff for accuracy.

·        Why you have removed the Official Poster and Official Teaser Trailer poster from the Masters and Vices Wikipedia page when the film’s Director and Producer clearly states the following on their FilmFreeway page: “A fair use policy is in place for the Official and Teaser Poster of Masters and Vices (2025) for all cast and crew and Film Festivals who have the film as part of their official selection or online articles, pages and forums who wish to cover and/or discuss the film”.

·        You have advised that the article “needs more sources to establish notability”. The article had 16 references, so please advise what you personally would consider enough references to establish nobility?

The Masters and Vices Wikipedia page has links to two artist’s Wikipedia pages- namely Bret Autry of Blue Stahli and Vartan Vahramian. The film’s end credits, trailer billing blocks and iMDB page all verify their contribution to the soundtrack, so am confused as to why you have considered the film to not be notable.

I would appreciate if you could respond to these queries by Friday 14^th November, so I know where I stand going forward

Kind regards

Filmbuff2025 Filmbuff2025 (talk) 09:26, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Masters and Vices 2025 Official Poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Masters and Vices 2025 Official Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Masters and Vices 2025 Teaser Poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Masters and Vices 2025 Teaser Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Masters and Vices for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masters and Vices is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masters and Vices until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BOVINEBOY2008 09:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nov 2025 - COI Enquiry

Hello, Filmbuff2025.

Are you affiliated personally or professionally in any way with the film Masters and Vices or its production staff? If you are, you must disclose this.

Thanks, Athanelar (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Athanelar,

Thank you for your message. No I am not.

Kind regards Filmbuff2025 (talk) 12:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did your edit summary for the creation of the Masters and Vices article describe it as the "official Wikipedia page of Masters and Vices"? Athanelar (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Athanelar,

Thank you for your message. The rationale for following this nomenclature is to act as a reference point in case the film features on another site or app which contains the word wiki or wikipedia- e.g. Moviepedia. The word ‘official’ aims to distinguish the Wikipedia page i.e. the official Wikipedia page from other websites or apps that sound similar.  I trust this answers your query.

Kind regards Filmbuff2025 (talk) 15:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make any sense at all. Your concern is that somebody's going to check the edit history for a Wikipedia article on Wikipedia and be confused about whether the article is on Wikipedia or another similarly-named site, and will be rescued from this confusion by you describing it as 'the official Wikipedia page' in your edit? Athanelar (talk) 15:18, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Athanelar,

Thank you for your message. It is to clarify what I edited- for all to see. Just as an example, the word official is used in film posters e.g. the Official Movie Poster to distinguish it from a Fan Made Movie Poster. I trust this answers your query.

Kind regards Filmbuff2025 (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Suspected deceptive COI/UPE by User:Filmbuff2025 at Masters and Vices. Thank you. Athanelar (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 19:16, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear I am bad at usernames,

Thank you for your message. With regards to the plot section of Masters and Vices, I was not aware that it was copyrighted material as the filmmaker did not specify this. Thank you for bringing his to my attention. I did slightly change the wording of the synopsis which I found online so it was not an exact copy of the one the filmmaker had released. I was under the impression that if I altered some of the wording or sentence structure then it would not have been flagged up as a copyright violation. Please could you kindly advise if one is allowed to add a plot section for the film and how to go about doing so- would I need to completely change the wording of the synopsis as long as it more or less describes the plot? Any advice and/or guidance which could be offered would be greatly appreciated.

Also, with regards to the posters of the film, the Director and Producer has specified in their FilmFreeway page (Masters and Vices - FilmFreeway) that a fair use policy is in place for them, hence me removing the copyright notice for those.

Kind regards Filmbuff2025 (talk) 08:58, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]