User talk:Fcstmani

Christian Bayemi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Christian Bayemi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will continue to work on the page, and make it as good as I can. Thank you for notifying me. :) {{Fcstmani}} Fcstmani (talk) 16:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Be sure to read WP:SIGCOV and look for independent sources that meet that standard. Every sports bio is required to include at least one source with SIGCOV -- stats pages, team website profiles, match coverage and transfer news don't qualify. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:24, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you for informing me. Fcstmani (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Diky za tvoj Spartak Trnava 2025-26. :) StanislavMošetk (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ďakujem! Nevedel som, že tá stránka má taký význam, len som videl, že to ešte nie je napísané, tak som to napísal. A ešte raz ďakujem! :D

~~~~Fcstmani~~~~ Fcstmani (talk) 09:53, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pivo pre teba!

Ďakujem za pridanie ďalších informácií k Michalovi Ščasny! :-) Sprt fan (talk) 13:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Diky! ;) Fcstmani (talk) 13:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

Please note that per WP:DRAFTNOCAT, drafts are not allowed to be filed in categories. The categories were removed from the draft because the draft cannot be in categories, so please don't readd them. Bearcat (talk) 05:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I thought that it was a mistake from someone. I’ll add them once the page will be published. Thank you for telling me. :) Fcstmani (talk) 06:02, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:5. Liga (Slovakia) clubs

A tag has been placed on Category:5. Liga (Slovakia) clubs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I know it is currently empty but when I put it’s name into a category generator it only shows a red link even though the category is published. Fcstmani (talk) 15:01, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok it is fixed now and the problem has been resolved. :D Fcstmani (talk) 15:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Ďakujeme, že vždy aktualizujete 2025-26 FC Spartak Trnava season! Držal palce proti Hackenovi! tu je tvoj “Barnstar” :D StanislavMošek 2 (talk) 18:07, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

dakujem!

tiež dúfam v to najlepšie proti Häcken. ;) Fcstmani (talk) 07:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 11:36, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick Hello, yes I do indeed agree with you that this is correct. I apologize for the inconvenience and I won’t make this mistake again.

Thank you, Fcstmani (talk) 11:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]