User talk:Earl Andrew

  1. Home
  2. Wiki



Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hullolympiques.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Hullolympiques.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 10:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Begg for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Begg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Begg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SolxrgashiUnited (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Quebec Challenge Cup.jpg.

This file is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the file description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука13 18:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DSC source for 2023 Can Junior U21?

[edit]

Hello Earl. Now I translate 2023 Canadian Junior Curling Championships to Rus-Wiki - and can't find source for DSC (not in article, not on Curling Canada website, of course not on CurlingZone). Maybe you remember from where DSC was taken? By the way MXMas & HNY & GoodGame! :) -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Took some sleuthing (Internet Archive, but then manually changing the URLs, and then a google search), but here are the women's and the men's. -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:19, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks! (because I was wondered about no source) I added it to en-Wiki too. -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Novice attempts at "The Shot"

[edit]

Hey Earl! Working on addressing GAR comments for Jennifer Jones (curler) and the reviewer would like a source for "[The Shot] became the source of talk and attempts by novice curlers to repeat the feat in curling clubs across the country." While I entirely believe that this is true, I can't find a mention of it in the Wyman book, and none of the news articles on "The Shot" that I've found mention it either. Do you know where I might find a reference for this, or should I just take it out? Allthegoldmedals (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Allthegoldmedals Maybe take it out? It doesn't sound like something I wrote, so I don't know where it came from. Probably just fancruft. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, it was added by an IP address in 2005. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:29, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Legend of 14 (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. First time in 20 years someone has complained about that. Old habits die hard.-- Earl Andrew - talk 21:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, there are two discussions at BLPN that Legend of 14 made. May want to respond accordingly. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 15:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And at it again. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 17:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove maintenance tags for no reason or readd unsourced content about living people, like you did on Darrel Kent and Allan Higdon. Thanks. Legend of 14 (talk) 15:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am objecting to your removal of content, as I find it unconstructive. -- Earl Andrew - talk 15:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BOLP requires contentious material about living persons be removed immediately. Do not readd material about living persons that has been removed without citations. Legend of 14 (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are removing information that is not contentious though. Accurate, even if not cited election results are not contentious. -- Earl Andrew - talk 15:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. Attributing someone to working at a body which makes controversial decisions or content about immigration status is contentious in my opinion. If it is accurate, add a citation.
"Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of living people or existing groups, and do not move it to the talk page."
-WP:Verifiability [formatting and links ommitted] Legend of 14 (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BLPN

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at WP:BLPN regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

To be honest Earl, I'm also kind of confused how this unsourced content ([1] [2] [3] [4]) is capable of just being added back to the article.

Per WP:BURDEN, Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source (emphasis added). Per WP:BLPRS, any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed... This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable and whether it is in a biography or in some other article. Maybe I'm missing something here. Could you help me understand? Tarlby (t) (c) 17:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
While it's within their rights to remove uncited claims per WP:BURDEN, I believe that Legend of 14's approach to doing so was destructive, and perhaps in bad faith. They were removing content from a lot of articles very quickly, most of the content being non contentious. Based on their edit history, and willingness to escalate this dispute, I do have to say I'm a bit suspicious of this user's true intentions.-- Earl Andrew - talk 18:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for answering. Although Legend's behavior could be in bad faith (idk, I didn't check thru their edits yet), are the edits themselves still appropriate? Can the unsourced content still be removed? Tarlby (t) (c) 18:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Taken in isolation, then yes, they are. I don't mind working to add sources to a couple of articles at a time.-- Earl Andrew - talk 18:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
👌👌👌👌 Tarlby (t) (c) 18:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand-Mère

[edit]
Notice

The article Grand-Mère has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unambiguous

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Scotties - Draw 17

[edit]

Hey Earl,

I am following the Scotties via the stats on Curling Canada's site and not able to watch live at the moment as I am at work.

I am wondering what is going on with Team Prince Edward Island in Draw 17. For the first two ends, they began the game with their normal lineup. However, beginning in the third end, both lead Whitney Jenkins and skip Jane DiCarlo (throwing third stones) both left the game with alternate Jenny White entering and leaving the team with three players and haven't found any updates online since they aren't the feature matchup. Wondering if both Jenkins and DiCarlo got injured or something else happened?

Also, I haven't found a reason why Team Nunavut lead Alison Taylor is not playing in Draw 17 either, but I presume she fell ill and had to play with three players since they didn't bring an alternate with (I did add the note to the 2025 Scotties page).

Thanks!

TheCaseDogg (talk) 20:57, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheCaseDogg The TSN announcers mentioned PEI is down to 3 players and that Dicarlo left the building. Didn't mention a reason I don't think, but I haven't been watching the whole game. @ TracyFleuryFan might have some insights -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just turned the game on so not sure TracyFleuryFan (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TracyFleuryFan @Earl Andrew I did add a basic note for PEI regarding the situation. If more insight comes or a specific reason, feel free to update. TheCaseDogg (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Mitchell (curler)

[edit]

Created but I'm a little unsure of all the lineup changes between 2021 and 2023. I see you made the pages for Rooney and Jacob Jones so if you see anything on this one I missed please add, thanks :) TracyFleuryFan (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I doubt I can be of any help, as I'm not privy to any sources that you also wouldn't have access to.-- Earl Andrew - talk 15:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hockeygermany.PNG

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hockeygermany.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

c

[edit]

Did you not see the source I posted? Or are you trying to ignore it?

https://ifosta.de/Sport/Curling/Maenner/12-InternationaleMeisterschaften/Europameisterschaften-Curling.html

https://ifosta.de/Sport/Curling/Frauen/12-InternationaleMeisterschaften/Europameisterschaften-CurlingFrauen.html

Tabelle

Although I didn't need a source for these at all because:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Routine_calculations

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Slam of Curling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steinbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1986 Hexagon World Men's Curling Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Sexes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rachel Homan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Sexes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ottawa Titans (disambiguation)

[edit]
Notice

The article Ottawa Titans (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unneeded 2 item dab page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

[edit]

WP:MOSBIO has an RfC

[edit]

WP:MOSBIO has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. MWFwiki (talk) 00:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ottawa French Seventh-day Adventist Church

[edit]

Thank you for sourcing this. If you haven't already, please sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/June 2025. Bearian (talk) 23:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PEI's 27 electoral districts

[edit]

Howdy. Why are you adding district numbers to 3 of Prince Edward Island's 27 electorial provinicial districts? This creates inconsistency. Also, we don't have such additions in provincial electoral districts of other provinces. So again, why introduce inconsistencies. GoodDay (talk) 09:13, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

District numbers are heavily used in PEI, more than any other province, and just as much as their actual names (sometimes moreso). If you look at elections PEI, there are links to the results of the two by-elections that don't even mention the riding's names, just the district numbers. Therefore, it's useful to have the district numbers in the article. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:11, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for completing the task, for in-province consistency. GoodDay (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Basketball Bronze alert in 2025 Canada Summer Games

[edit]

Wake up! Women's Basketball Bronze alert! At the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sailing alert in 2025 Canada Summer Games

[edit]

Wake up! Sailing alert! At the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no need to spam my talk page. I'll add the medals when they've been posted. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:53, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Men's Beach Volleyball Bronze Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 18:40, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Men's Baseball Bronze Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Men's Basketball Bronze Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Women's Beach Volleyball Bronze Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 19:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tennis alert! At the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 20:06, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Men's Beach Volleyball Gold Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Women's Beach Volleyball Gold Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 21:20, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Women's Basketball Gold Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 21:36, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Men's Baseball Gold Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 22:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Men's Basketball Gold Medal Match is finished at the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 22:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I asked you to stop spamming my talk page. That last two events aren't even over yet! -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:01, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
sorry. 47.55.238.86 (talk) 23:28, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I bet you not guessed who won men's baseball. It's British Colombia. 47.55.238.86 (talk) 23:43, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I bet you not guessed who won men's basketball. It's Alberta. 47.55.238.86 (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Men's Artistic 3M alert! At the 2025 Canada Summer Games! 47.55.238.86 (talk) 22:05, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked you several times to stop spamming my talk page. If you do it again, I will have you blocked. -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:07, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I need your help! Can you do Artistic swimming Solo Women's Medalists, please? Thanks. 47.55.238.86 (talk) 20:22, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

shifting the odds

[edit]

The time has come for shift the odds on Artistic Swimming - Solo Technical, Diving - Men's Artistic 3M Final and Diving - Women's Artistic 3M Final 47.55.238.86 (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2025 Canada Summer Games

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 Canada Summer Games, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:16, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Little Lake

[edit]

What was the source for all of the entries that you added? I assume you were working from a list of some sort? Useddenim (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That whole page is unsourced, so forgive me for not including them, but you can find their sources here List of lakes of Ontario: L#Lita–Little_A. -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:54, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025–26 curling season

[edit]

Sorry, but what source do want here Career on hiatus from team curling? The mentioned team does NOT exist anymore, players do NOT play anymore, therefore the names are missed. Btw, Curlingzone is the most reliable source for Curling data. I have revised your decision, and I hope you respect that. --62.46.124.92 (talk) 10:16, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The "source" you used does not mention the team in question at all. Find a news source that actually mentions the team isn't playing.-- Earl Andrew - talk 13:34, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editor conduct and warring

[edit]

Hi Earl. I’m a somewhat new editor. I saw that you were recently active and I wonder if you’d check out the Talk pages for the article on Jimmy Keene and the editor Sandyn987. I originally edited Keene’s article to refer to him as an “informant” rather than as an “operative,” and there’s been a low-grade edit war going with Sandyn, who has insisted in several LLM-authored comments that he be referred to as an “operative” despite the term’s vagueness. I considered leaving a note on WP:ANI, but I’ve never done anything like this before and would appreciate the independent perspective of a longtime Wikipedia. Plus, one of my own edits to the Keene article (terming him a “jailhouse informant,” which I made in the spirit of boldness, to try to break the back-and-forth reversion) was deemed inappropriate by another editor, so I don’t want it to seem personal. SharkJumperNYC (talk) 01:42, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Longtime *Wikipedian. I’m so new here I don’t even know the norms around editing obvious typos out of my comments on a user Talk page! SharkJumperNYC (talk) 01:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, it's probably best to find someone who is more familiar with the subject. Cheers. -- Earl Andrew - talk 02:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy 22nd Wikibirthday!

[edit]

CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 00:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

🎉 Earl Andrew's first edit anniversary!

[edit]

Hey @Earl Andrew. Your wiki edit anniversary was 1 day ago, marking 22 years of dedicated contributions to this Wikimedia project. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. With over 154,048 edits, your dedication is an inspiration to the community. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 03:10, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]