User talk:Devolver789

August 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Draft:Steal a Brainrot, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steal a Brainrot (August 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has been previously declined nine times (this and alt title), and yet there is no evidence of notability. From this I can only conclude that better sources are not available. To avoid wasting further reviewer time on this draft, I am therefore now rejecting rather than merely declining this.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Devolver789! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Messing about

When an admin formats a draft page in a particular way, especially after rejecting it, then changing the order of things is a) completely unnecessary and b) childishly disruptive. Please stop, then go have a read of Wikipedia:Competence is required and think about whether you should continue contributing. Sorry to sound harsh, although we are all required to assume good faith in others (WP:AGF) you have sorely tested that. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, and I must warn Devolver789 that they are much closer to getting blocked than they probably realise. Time to fall in line and quit mucking around. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With the IP sockpuppetry that warning has clearly fallen on deaf ears. WP:NOTHERE applies! 10mmsocket (talk) 07:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing You know you could've moved Steal a Brainrot into List of Roblox games which I didn't think of Devolver789 (talk) 18:22, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My block has already expired where i'm from (not United States) + Wikipedia really needs to add more than one Timezone for comments and elsewhere so it'll be easier to know Devolver789 (talk) 13:45, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How many times do you need to be told to stop messing about with the templates in the draft article? Leave them as they are, they were put there for good reason. As the draft has been rejected you should now just leave it alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 10mmsocket (talk • contribs) 16:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 99 Nights in the Forest

A tag has been placed on 99 Nights in the Forest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Was originally a redirect to a section in the target article but the section has been deleted as unsourced and unsuitable so this redirect is no longer needed.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hi Devolver789! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of Roblox games several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:List of Roblox games, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But this time I added info that relates to the citations why remove it again? Devolver789 (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They were really low quality and it was all badly written, not in an encyclopaedic style. Please discuss further on the article's talk page if you feel the need to go further with it. Personally I would suggest you walk away from creating content for a while, and learn your craft by improving other articles. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Draft talk:Rockaroni penguin, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PamD 18:03, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steal a Brainrot has been accepted

Steal a Brainrot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:06, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strikçan Roman burial has been accepted

Strikçan Roman burial, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:07, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]