User talk:Clicklander

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of rail transport in Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Euromed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing and edit warring

Please stop your disruptive editing in Greece men's national basketball team. You just revert the edits, with no reason or explanataion at all, just stating that they are "non-referenced", while the reference is just above, at the current roster. The depth chart (as the phrase says) depends on the current roster, and there are rules that define that. There is a reference of the final roster in the page, that consists of 12 players. These are the EXACT players you put on the depth chart. All the others ARE NOT PART OF THE ROSTER. You can't just make things out of your head. Please, accept that you are wrong on this one, so we can put that behind us, or you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Panosgatto (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong. However, if you want you can express your arguments in the article’s talk page. In the meantime please stop editing without providing sufficient references. Clicklander (talk) 20:05, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clicklander (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing more than removing non-referenced edits. Everything is well explained in the talk page of the article Clicklander (talk) 20:03, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That isn't a valid reason to edit war. PhilKnight (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clicklander (talk) 20:03, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clicklander (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request to be unblocked because I want to request administrators attention regarding an unsourced edit that remains in place in the Greece men's national basketball team page and ask for page protection. Clicklander (talk) 05:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Okay, that's why you want to be unblocked, but you have not convinced us that you understand why you were blocked and will not repeat the behavior. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clicklander (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for requesting unblock again but I have no other way to communicate. I am fine with my penalty. What is not fine for me is that there is still this misleading and unsourced information in the page. You can either unblock me in order for me to post a message to the administrators and then block me again, or somebody else do that for me. Thanks Clicklander (talk) 11:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clicklander, there are only six days left in your block. Please simply log off and come back after the block expires. There is no deadline to discuss the edit that you want to make, and the article will still be here for you when you return. Other editors are not able to make the edit or post a content-related notice on your behalf, as it would be a violation of the policy against proxying.

Before you resume editing, please take time to read the entire edit warring policy, including the three-revert rule and its only eligible exceptions, as well as the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (WP:BRD) to understand the expectations around reverting edits in articles. For extra reading that will be helpful in your future edits, please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution § Resolving content disputes. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 23:24, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.