User talk:Ckfasdf

  1. Home
  2. Wiki


icon
Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Ckfasdf, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 15:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for granting me NPR right. I'll review those links and make sure to follow best practices. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:15, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk About Indonesian military ranks

[edit]

Assalamu'alaykum, wr. wb, Saya member baru dari akun Wikipedia ini. Saya ingin menambahkan desain Tanda Pangkat untuk AL dan AU periode 1945-1947. Bagaimana untuk tanggapannya bung ?
Link : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1l0V8LLHvd3wzCqzX3PV_6ysmHtBfEep4?usp=sharing
Foto Lokasi : Museum Satria Mandala
Instagram : @bung_reki_fadhullah
Sekian dari saya dan terima kasih Reki Fadhullah AKA Abu Khabr (talk) 05:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reki Fadhullah AKA Abu Khabr: If you created those rank images yourself based on photos taken at the Satria Mandala Museum, please feel free to upload the rank images to Commons so they can be added to the article. I don’t see anything preventing you from doing that. We might also consider reworking the military rank article to include these images. Ckfasdf (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bupati articles deletion

[edit]

Hi Ckfasdf. I saw that you created AfD nomination for some bupatis because they do not pass WP:NPOL. Majority of the bupati's AfD resulted in soft deletion. However, I found that there are bupati articles that not only pass WP:GNG, but also appeared on the ITN and DYK such as Saply TH, Kalatiku Paembonan, Husnie Hentihu, Azmun Jaafar, Harunata, Mochamad Hasbi, Ratna Ani Lestari, Hasto Wardoyo, and Najmul Akhyar. May I know in what situations the bupati article can survive? Faldi00 (talk) 08:35, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Faldi00: Per WP:NPOL, only those who have held international, national, or province-wide office, or who have been members of legislative bodies at those levels, are presumed notable. However, if a bupati receives sufficient significant national coverage, then they may qualify under WP:GNG. I emphasize national coverage here, since any bupati will naturally receive some local coverage, which may not qualify to establish notability, see WP:MILL. Ckfasdf (talk) 09:07, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ckfasdf: There are no requirements for sources to be national outlets, to note. Local/provincial level coverage is acceptable as secondary sources as well. Juxlos (talk) 05:05, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Juxlos: Local/provincial level coverage is acceptable as source, but not sufficient to establish notability. Per WP:AUD, which also can be applied here, Significant coverage in media with an international, national, or at least regional audience (e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state) is a strong indication of notability. Ckfasdf (talk) 06:57, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
at least regional audience - I mean, that is provincial. "Local" for places like e.g. Surabaya or Makassar would be a larger audience than some US states. Outlets like Jubi or Bangka Pos (admittedly latter has been Tribun-ized, but point stands) would qualify under the later definition. Juxlos (talk) 07:03, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Juxlos: WP:AUD's example of "the biggest daily newspaper in any US state" sets a minimum threshold for what qualifies as a sub-national source. By that standard, Jubi would not qualify, and Bangka Pos or other Tribun group is at best debatable. Ckfasdf (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)/Audience requirement (the page linked to at WP:AUD): Acceptable sources for the purpose of fulfilling the audience criterion always include, but are not limited to.....
every newspaper that has a regional media market (e.g., The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune, Star Tribune, The Boston Globe)...all regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international magazines and other periodicals (e.g., Sports Illustrated, Good Housekeeping, Bloomberg Businessweek, Editor & Publisher, Aviation Week & Space Technology; however, exclude periodicals with limited interest or limited circulation) Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 14:04, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeromi Mikhael: Note that Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)/Audience requirement is an essay of policy, not the policy itself. However, I agree with its conclusion that the purpose of the restrictions on media... is to include in Wikipedia subjects that have received attention from the world at large. By that standard, relatively unknown bupati (regents), some of whom dont even have an article on idwiki, are unlikely to have received attention from the world at large. IMO, we also do not need articles for all 363 bupati in Indonesia unless they are clearly notable beyond their local area. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do we count Tribun as each a chain of separate provincial papers so happened to be owned by a company owned by an even larger company or is it the larger tribun network with local sections for different regions Technetium 99m (talk) 17:11, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Technetium 99m:I'd suggest avoiding the use of local sections of a major news chain as the basis for establishing notability. But if a subject is already shown to be notable in multiple broader sources, then local sections can still be used to add more details. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richeese Factory (September 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 11:27, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Ckfasdf for accumulating at least 100 points the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Utopes (talk / cont) 03:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

[edit]

Rack and pinion Award

This award is given in recognition to Ckfasdf for accumulating at least 15 points during each week of the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Utopes (talk / cont) 04:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article review

[edit]

Hello, could you please review, Alfred Gangata and Tonse Alliance. these articles are not available from search engines eg Google. Af265 (talk) 09:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian J-10CE confirmation

[edit]

Several recent news sources (circa October 2025) indicate confirmation or a firm plan by the Indonesian government (through the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Finance) to purchase 42 J-10C/J-10CE fighter jets from China, with an estimated budget of over US$9 billion. Official Statements: The Ministers of Defense and Finance are said to have confirmed this purchase plan. Strategy Shift: This deal is seen as the first major step in the procurement of a major weapons system from a non-Western country in significant quantities, marking the diversification of assets and the modernization of the Indonesian military. In short, the J-10CE was chosen because it is considered capable of offering an optimal combination of advanced technological capabilities (Generation 4.5), competitive prices, and the strategic benefits of diversifying defense equipment sources for Indonesia. https://mistar.id/news/nasional/indonesia-resmi-beli-42-jet-tempur-j10c-dari-china-tanda-perubahan-arah-strategis (https://www.detik.com/jateng/bisnis/d-8164951/menkeu-purbaya-setujui-anggaran-beli-jet-tempur-china-j-10-rp-148-t#:~:text=Menkeu%20Purbaya%20Setujui%20Anggaran%20Beli,J%2D10%20Rp%20148%20T) Presiden revanisme (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://travel.detik.com/travel-news/d-8166782/indonesia-resmi-membeli-jet-china-chengdu-j-10-ini-arti-kata-chengdu#:~:text=menariknya%20di%20sini!-,Indonesia%20Resmi%20Membeli%20Jet%20China%20Chengdu,10%2C%20Ini%20Arti%20Kata%20Chengdu&text=Pemerintah%20Indonesia%20resmi%20membeli%20jet,Guizhou%20Aircraft%20Corporation%20mulai%202024.&text=Dikutip%20dari%20China%20Discovery%2C%20Chengdu,sepatu%20(Hibiscus%20rosa%20sinensis). Presiden revanisme (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Presiden revanisme: Military aircraft acquisition usually follows several steps: starting with defining operational needs and preparing an acquisition plan, followed by engaging with suppliers, securing budget approval, obtaining export and political clearances, and finally signing a purchase contract before production and delivery. Only after the contract is signed can the purchase be considered a confirmed order.
In Indonesia's J-10C case, the plan and budget have been approved and publicly confirmed, but no contract signing or delivery has been reported yet. Therefore, it remains in the pre-contract stage, and the aircraft should only be listed in an inventory table once the order is confirmed or, if that information is not available, after the aircraft are delivered. This approach ensures accuracy and is consistent with other aircraft inventory tables in air force articles. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note that, three other editors (Morkyies23, Jauhsekali and A.C.O.M.S-2023) have also opposed adding the J-10C to the table for the same reason. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:53, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

[edit]

Hey @Ckfasdf bro, What are the things needed to be added and to be corrected on my recently created page on Nusantara Lima satellite. Also i am in planning to make another one for Merah Putih-2 satellites. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is currently centered on the launch, so it would benefit from more content about the satellite itself. Expanding sections on background, mission objectives, and technical specifications would make it more complete and balanced. There are sources available to expand these additions, although most of them are in Indonesian, which may be a challenge for non-Indonesian speakers. Ckfasdf (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I will use them Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of The Independent School of Jakarta

[edit]

Hello Ckfasdf,

I’m writing to ask about the deletion of The Independent School of Jakarta, which was removed as appearing promotional. I now recognise that some of the language I used was subjective and understand why it triggered that tag.

First of all, I want to apologise — I’m not a frequent Wikipedia editor, and I certainly didn’t intend to waste anyone’s time. I appreciate the work that reviewers and editors like you do. I can see that parts of the article’s tone could have read like marketing, which I am willing to correct if you agree the topic itself is notable enough to merit inclusion.

I believe the school now meets the notability requirements for educational institutions because it has received substantial independent media coverage in connection with a national scholarship for Indonesian students named in honour of Ki Hajar Dewantara. I have located 11 separate articles (plus one print feature) in different publications reporting on this initiative (I've listed these at User:Rsasubs/ISJ sources). I was intending to suggest a line under the Ki Hajar Dewantara#Tribute after creating the school article.

I had mistakenly not declared my conflict of interest which has now been rectified on my user page (see User:Rsasubs#Conflict_of_interest_disclosure) and now understand that I should have approached the editing differently because of that. I apologise again for any inconvenience caused and would appreciate your advice on next steps.

For example, would you be open to restoring the deleted article into my userspace (for example, User:Rsasubs/ISJ) so that I can rework it in a neutral tone and add the independent sources? Of course if you think another approach is more suitable I’m happy to follow your guidance.

Thank you very much for your time and help. Rsasubs (talk) 12:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsasubs: Thanks for your message. Just to clarify, I'm not an administrator, so I can't restore deleted pages. You'll need to contact the admin who deleted the article to request restoration to your userspace.
Also, since you've acknowledged a conflict of interest with the Independent School of Jakarta, you should avoid editing the article directly. As WP:COI notes, COI editing is strongly discouraged. You may instead submit a draft through Articles for Creation. Ckfasdf (talk) 12:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richeese Factory has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richeese Factory. Thanks! Valereee (talk) 17:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of rollback

[edit]

Hi Ckfasdf! Happy Friday! I ran into this edit to House of Representatives (Indonesia) that you reverted just moments ago. Why did you use rollback on this edit? I'm just curious more than anything. FYI - this edit was made shortly after the revert. Please let me know. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the note. The previous edit reintroduced italics instead of using {{lang}}, which is the format recommended by the guideline per MOS:LANG. I don’t have any issue with the IPA; I should have just used a manual revert. Sorry about that. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No need to apologize! I was just checking in with you about it. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:45, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why, i created page always nomination deleted ?

[edit]

Hi Ckfasdf! I’m writing to ask about the Liputan 6 Moji is bad article ?

Roseangelina (talk) 14:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Roseangelina: It’s not about the article being bad. "Bad article" is not really a reason for deletion anyway. The issue is that it’s an unnecessary content fork. Information about Liputan 6 Moji can simply be included in the main Liputan 6 article. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary account IP viewer granted

[edit]
The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address

Hello, Ckfasdf. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

  • You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
  • Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

  • When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
  • Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
  • Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Sohom (talk) 06:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request: Review article on the 13th Ephorus of HKBP

[edit]

@Ckfasdf: I see that you weighed in on the deletion discussion for Bonar Napitupulu and then worked on the article, removing the numerous redlinks.

The page on J.R. Hutauruk, the 13th Ephorus of HKBP, also has a similar issue. I'm not familiar with the topic of HKBP, so don't know which red links might be appropriate to leave, if any. If you have time and the inclination, would you please copy edit J.R. Hutauruk as well? — ERcheck (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ERcheck: I’ll see what I can do. I'm also not very familiar with HKBP topic and only work from whatever sources are available. Unlike Bonar Napitupulu, whose original article had usable sources to work with, the article on J.R. Hutauruk does not have usable sources. The only sources currently available does not give meaningful biographical information, and my own search didn't turn up anything beyond WordPress or blogspot, which are not acceptable as RS. Without RS, it's difficult to expand the article. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ckfasdf - I saw those. As the WordPress page is "ENSIKLOPEDIA TOKOH BATAK", do you think it might be reliable? I've found that some places, such as Singapore's national library (medium.com), use "self-published" sites, for some official writings. Is "ENSIKLOPEDIA TOKOH BATAK" legit? — ERcheck (talk) 15:25, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ERcheck: The information itself is likely legit; the issue is the source. I've reworked the article using those sources and added them into the article, but this has triggered the SPS tag. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richeese Factory has been accepted

[edit]
Richeese Factory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Valereee (talk) 17:20, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sammi578's articles

[edit]

Hello Ckfasdf,

I've been going through the articles on Indonesian trains created by Sammi578 (see ANI thread) and I noticed your sources exist tag on Singasari (train). No pressure if you don't have time, but are you interested in helping salvage the articles that have been draftified? (see User talk:Sammi578) I suspect most are notable, but there's a combination of insufficient sourcing and spelling/grammar issues that have forced draftification. Unfortunately, Sammi578 has never engaged on his/her talk page, which resulted in an indefinite block from mainspace. If you can identify any drafts that are salvageable, I'd be willing to help out with copyediting. It would be a shame for all these drafts to end up deleted, but they can't be in mainspace as is. Thanks for your consideration. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Trainsandotherthings: Hi, I agree that most of the train articles that he created are likely notable, but the sourcing is quite weak in many of them. It also looks like Sammi578 translated a lot of the content from idwiki, where sourcing standards are not as strict as on enwiki. I’ll review the drafts when I have some time. I have worked on several of his train articles before. Ckfasdf (talk) 00:45, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]