User talk:Circassian bubuzuan

Defeat of the Nogais and Crimeans (1576) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Defeat of the Nogais and Crimeans (1576). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 12:22, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Circassian bubuzuan. Thank you for your work on Circassian–Golden Horde War (1498). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Circassian bubuzuan. Thank you for your work on Crimean-Nogai raid on Circassia (1576). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with reliable sources. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Circassian naval raid on the Ottoman Empire (1572) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Circassian naval raid on the Ottoman Empire (1572). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Kajmer05 (talk) 17:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Circassian–Golden Horde War (1498) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Circassian–Golden Horde War (1498). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), you may be blocked from editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crimean-Nogai raid on Circassia (1576) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Draft:Crimean-Nogai raid on Circassia (1576). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Safavid invasion of Kumykia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Safavid invasion of Kumykia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Kajmer05 (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Battle of Don (1646)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Battle of Don (1646), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
The page exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. (See the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Felicia (talk) 14:35, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Circassian raid on Anatolia (1572)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Circassian raid on Anatolia (1572), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
The page exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. (See the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Felicia (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Circassian–Golden Horde War (1498)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Circassian–Golden Horde War (1498), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
The page exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. (See the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Felicia (talk) 14:55, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Circassian bubuzuan. Felicia (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Safavid invasion of Kumykia

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Safavid invasion of Kumykia, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. shane (talk to me if you want!) 16:29, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Battle of Don (1646)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Battle of Don (1646), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. shane (talk to me if you want!) 16:29, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Crimean-Nogai raid on Circassia (1576)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Crimean-Nogai raid on Circassia (1576), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. shane (talk to me if you want!) 16:29, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Defeat of the Nogais and Crimeans (1576)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Defeat of the Nogais and Crimeans (1576), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. shane (talk to me if you want!) 16:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Circassian–Safavid War (1547) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Circassian–Safavid War (1547). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for failing to engage with editors' concerns at ANI.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:04, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editors have raised substantive concerns about your edits at ANI that you need to engage with, or you are going to be blocked from editing. Your participation at the ANI thread is requested, as communication is not optional.

In Russian, with additional explanation of WP:ENGLISHPLEASE: Разные эдиторы представили серезные критики о вашем написанах, и вам надо отвечать них перед вы продолжите в работе Википедии. Если вы не отвечаете них, вы будете блокировать. Генерально, надо говорить здесь по английски, потому-что это Википиедия английского языка, а ваши редактированные резюмы предлагать что вы может выть не понимаете по английски. Если это правд, лучше способствовать на русском Википедии, где вы наверно можете общаться без проблемы. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:17, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Circassian–Safavid War (1547)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Circassian–Safavid War (1547), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Felicia (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't want to bother you, but could you please answer? Circassian bubuzuan (talk) 11:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Circassian bubuzuan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I have received an indefinite account suspension Circassian bubuzuan. I admit violating two rules: creating multiple accounts and using AI (ChatGPT) to write articles. I was an inexperienced beginner and did not know that this is prohibited - I thought that this way I could create content for Wikipedia faster. Now I have carefully read the rules of WP:MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS and WP:ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and fully understand my mistake. I promise to use only this account in the future, write articles on my own, and carefully study the rules. Please give me a second chance. Circassian bubuzuan (talk) 13:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello. I have received an indefinite account suspension Circassian bubuzuan. I admit violating two rules: creating multiple accounts and using AI (ChatGPT) to write articles. I was an inexperienced beginner and did not know that this is prohibited - I thought that this way I could create content for Wikipedia faster. Now I have carefully read the rules of WP:MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS and WP:ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and fully understand my mistake. I promise to use only this account in the future, write articles on my own, and carefully study the rules. Please give me a second chance. [[User:Circassian bubuzuan|Circassian bubuzuan]] ([[User talk:Circassian bubuzuan#top|talk]]) 13:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello. I have received an indefinite account suspension Circassian bubuzuan. I admit violating two rules: creating multiple accounts and using AI (ChatGPT) to write articles. I was an inexperienced beginner and did not know that this is prohibited - I thought that this way I could create content for Wikipedia faster. Now I have carefully read the rules of WP:MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS and WP:ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and fully understand my mistake. I promise to use only this account in the future, write articles on my own, and carefully study the rules. Please give me a second chance. [[User:Circassian bubuzuan|Circassian bubuzuan]] ([[User talk:Circassian bubuzuan#top|talk]]) 13:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello. I have received an indefinite account suspension Circassian bubuzuan. I admit violating two rules: creating multiple accounts and using AI (ChatGPT) to write articles. I was an inexperienced beginner and did not know that this is prohibited - I thought that this way I could create content for Wikipedia faster. Now I have carefully read the rules of WP:MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS and WP:ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and fully understand my mistake. I promise to use only this account in the future, write articles on my own, and carefully study the rules. Please give me a second chance. [[User:Circassian bubuzuan|Circassian bubuzuan]] ([[User talk:Circassian bubuzuan#top|talk]]) 13:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Circassian bubuzuan (talk) 13:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell us what topics you are interested in writing about, if unblocked? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In response to PhilKnight: Thank you for considering my appeal. If unblocked, my primary interest lies in contributing to articles related to **Caucasian history, especially Circassian (Adyghe) and North Caucasian medieval and early modern history**. Based on reliable sources I have studied, I could help improve or create articles on topics like the Russo-Circassian alliance, specific historical conflicts in the region (e.g., in the 16th-18th centuries), and notable figures. My goal is to write neutrally, cite proper academic sources, and collaborate with other editors to ensure quality. Circassian bubuzuan (talk) 14:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was afraid you'd say. So far all your creations in that subject area have been deleted, at least some as hoaxes. It has also been noted several times that your referencing and evidence of notability are very inadequate.

Eastern Europe is a contentious topic area, where standards are enforced strictly. Moreover, northern Caucasus is at least adjacent to Armenian-Azerbaijan topics, which are under even stronger restrictions (so much so that you are not allowed to edit in that area until your account is extended confirmed, which you are nowhere near yet).

I know you were blocked for using multiple accounts, and I'm happy to accept your assurances that you won't continue doing so. However, I'm concerned that if I were to unblock you, you would simply continue editing the way you have until now, and that would only get you into trouble and most likely blocked again. I won't decline your unblock request, though, I'll let another admin take a view in case they have a different take on this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In response to DoubleGrazing: I understand. My goal here was to share the history of my people. I realize now that my methods were wrong. I respect your work and the decision you or another admin will make. Sorry to have disturbed you. Circassian bubuzuan (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I know this is probably disheartening, but it doesn't mean that you can't edit at all. There's the Wikipedia:Standard offer, where you edit at another Wikipedia project for six months or so (providing you're not blocked there) in order to build up a history of productive editing.

You can then submit another appeal, which has a much better chance of success now you have proof backing you up. You can find a list of projects by clicking here.

That said, if you need AI to write properly in English, perhaps you might be better working exclusively at a Wikipedia in your native language? There are hundreds on the link above. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

== Clarification of Intent and Future Contributions ==To the Wikipedia community,I am writing to express my sincere gratitude to the editors and administrators who have taken the time to review my situation and provide guidance. I also want to clarify my intentions moving forward.I am a real person from the Caucasus region. My native language is not English, and I have been seeking help to understand the complex policies and express my thoughts correctly. The final decision and intent in all my communications are my own.My primary goal is to contribute positively to Wikipedia by creating and improving quality encyclopedic content. I have a strong interest in working across language projects, specifically in English and Russian, to share knowledge and bridge information gaps.I fully understand and accept the path forward suggested to me. I will focus on building a constructive editing history on the Russian Wikipedia to demonstrate my commitment to the project's rules and values.Thank you for your understanding and for maintaining the high standards of this project.— Circassian bubuzuan (talk) Circassian bubuzuan (talk) 18:34, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I think the main concern is that editing English Wikipedia requires a high degree of fluency in the English language.

If you need to use tools to edit (be it AI, LLM, Chatbot or translation software), you won't be able to accurately judge whether a source is reliable, whether the standards of neutrality are being met, whether promotional language is being used or whether copyright is being infringed.

These skills are hard to learn for native English speakers, if you can't write complex English unaided then it's probably not a good idea for you to edit this version of Wikipedia. There are hundreds of other Wikipedia projects for you to choose from, however. Blue Sonnet (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Please do not use AI to generate your messages, we want to hear from you, not from some random algorithm. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To DoubleGrazing: I understand why you think that. I'm not using ChatGPT or any AI. I'm trying to write correctly in English, which is difficult for me. Sometimes I use a translator for single words, but the thoughts and apologies are my own. My goal to share Caucasus history is real. I am learning from my mistakes. Circassian bubuzuan (talk) 15:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]