User talk:Cagrantsas

Charles Stankievech

After you have proposed an article for deletion, and that proposal is removed, it is not appropriate to add it back. If you think the article should be deleted, please submit it to Articles for Deletion with your deletion rationale. MediaKyle (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, Cagrantsas, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Adeline2018 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MediaKyle (talk) 23:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MediaKyle, Thanks for your message. I want to clarify that I previously edited under another account while affiliated with a different institution. When I relocated to France for a short research stay during the third year of my PhD, my institution advised me to begin with a clean slate for professional and privacy reasons. I created this new account accordingly and have not used the previous one since. This was done in good faith, following the principles of WP:CLEANSTART.

I am not coordinating edits off-wiki. My work remains focused on feminist art, Canadian artists, and issues of institutional accountability — including documentation efforts around fabricated exhibition histories and MeToo-related cases, as in the case of the artist in question. If any further clarification or disclosure is needed, I’m happy to provide it. Cagrantsas (talk) 01:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for getting back to me. I'm not sure what the deal is with Charles Stankievech, but if you have reliable sources to back it up I'm happy to add it to the article, just let me know. Just so you're aware, a clean start implies that you don't intend on returning to the same topics, and it only took a brief glance at the edit history of the aforementioned article for me to infer that the will to delete it was probably related to the edit that added the MeToo category. Cheers, MediaKyle (talk) 14:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]