User talk:Bradysc112

December 2025

Hello, I'm LuniZunie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Marcel Prévost have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. – LuniZunie_(talk) 21:11, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or are you unhappy that I use my resources to fix slip? Bradysc112 (talk) 21:14, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VViking_TalkEdits 21:11, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There’s is a lot of work to be done. AI is the only edge we have Bradysc112 (talk) 21:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you.

Vandalize? Or fix sloppy work Bradysc112 (talk) 21:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brady. You absolutely need to stop spamming these sources everywhere. LLMs tend to introduce many problems (see WP:LLM for more info) and you are doing this far too quickly for you to be properly reviewing your edits. Toadspike [Talk] Toadspike [Talk] 21:16, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is the biggest problem not a lack of funding and editors? Bradysc112 (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are millions of articles which need attention? Bradysc112 (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any advice how to go about this as effectively as possible without LLMs? Bradysc112 (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I suggest finding sources – you are welcome to let the LLM suggest sources for you – then reading them yourself, summarizing the source information, and adding that to articles. If you would like to create new articles, I suggest reading Help:Your first article or at least working through that article creation wizard. Please let me know if you have any questions. Toadspike [Talk] 21:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will take that into consideration Bradysc112 (talk) 21:22, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you need help, feel free to reach out to either of us =) – LuniZunie_(talk) 21:23, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bradysc112 (talk) 21:51, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI

Why is AI an issue when we have a whole site to fix and edit? Bradysc112 (talk) 21:14, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is based on facts which AI does not always provide. AI is also an issue with plagiarism and copyright issues. Finally it lacks the nuance needed for Wikipedia articles. If you have any more questions please reach out, do NOT spam, just ask a normal amount of questions. Dafootballguy (talk) 21:22, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing Wikipedia

Any solutions that don’t require a full time staff or AI? Bradysc112 (talk) 21:19, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing out flaws without Giving Solutions

Would the world not be a better place if when you critique you give alternatives? Bradysc112 (talk) 21:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]