User talk:An anonymous username, not my real name

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.


Your GA nomination of Tinodon

[edit]

The article Tinodon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tinodon and Talk:Tinodon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tinodon

[edit]

The article Tinodon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tinodon for comments about the article, and Talk:Tinodon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Jefferson GA Nomination

[edit]

Hi. You recently removed my nomination of Thomas Jefferson for a GA article saying it might be a “drive-by nomination”. Could you elaborate what you mean by this?

Firstly, I’m not sure how to check what percentage I am in the number of editors.

Secondly, what is a drive-by nomination? I’m not sure what you mean, but to me it sounds like it’s a nomination where someone just puts it up for GA and then doesn’t go back to it. I read through the article and thought it looked good, so I put it up for GA. While waiting, I would continue to re-read everything and fix it, like I’m doing with a different nomination of mine.

Lastly, what do you mean by “no message on the article’s talk page”? I have spoken on the talk page and replied to an edit request. In the reply, I also stated I was WORKING on upgrading it to GA status.

Please respond to me as soon as you can. Thank you. Ali Beary (talk!) 15:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ali Beary: You have authored a very small percentage of the current article. It's not uncommon for newer users to nominate articles they happen to like without being prepared to actually undertake the review process, which is what is considered a drive-by nomination. For an article like this, I imagine the review process will be quite long and tedious, and it will take up a lot of time on the reviewer's part, so it's important that the nominator is truly prepared and invested. As for your message on the talk page, it had nothing to do with the GAN. If you are indeed prepared to undertake this challenge, then I suppose you are free to proceed. Reach out to me if you would like additional help. — Anonymous 15:55, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am prepared for this. On my first GA, I spent a month fixing tons of work on Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton. I am also waiting for a response for my GAN on John Laurens. I understand that nominations are a lot of hard work for both the reviewer and the nominee, but I’m prepared for it. Ali Beary (talk!) 16:00, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, good luck! — Anonymous 16:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, anonymous! Ali Beary (talk!) 16:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Arundelconodon

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arundelconodon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Arundelconodon

[edit]

The article Arundelconodon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Arundelconodon and Talk:Arundelconodon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Arundelconodon

[edit]

The article Arundelconodon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arundelconodon for comments about the article, and Talk:Arundelconodon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]