User talk:Amalrajrb

Amalrajrb, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amalrajrb! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhoje Gowd Erathimmanna (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhoje Gowd Erathimmanna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bhoje Gowd Erathimmanna, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 05:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E. Bhoje Gowd (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:E. Bhoje Gowd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 15:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:E. Bhoje Gowd

Hello, Amalrajrb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "E. Bhoje Gowd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:E. Bhoje Gowd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:E. Bhoje Gowd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.niist.res.in/index.php/dr-e-bhoje-gowd. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock

I was preparing a page for my professor. what I did the mistake is I copied the contents from or website and pasted without editing. I won't repeat this mistake. Please consider my request

thank you Amalrajrb (talk) 08:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,

I was preparing a page for my professor. what I did the mistake is I copied the contents from or website and pasted without editing. I won't repeat this mistake. Please consider my request

Please consider my request to unblock. Amalrajrb (talk) 05:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please acccept my request to ublock Amalrajrb (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak I was preparing a page for my professor. what I did the mistake is I copied the contents from our website and pasted without editing. I won't repeat this mistake. What ever the details I provided is true. Please consider my request Amalrajrb (talk) 05:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• Much of your text was unsourced, every thing you write must be referenced. Note that his NIIST page is not an independent third-party source

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI on your user page, User:Amalrajrb.

I see that you haven't been warned or recreated deleted text, so I'll unblock you. Please follow the guidance above to the letter, especially declaring your COI, and take your time if you decide to recreate Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so very much Amalrajrb (talk) 06:49, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I note that @Jimfbleak previously blocked you for inappropriate behavior that I have warned you about. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at E. Bhoje Gowd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please stop removing the notability tag or no link tag. Your changes are not relevant to either. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to E. Bhoje Gowd. You were previously blocked for inappropriate behavior. Removing unsourced information tags is highly inappropriate. This is your third warning about this behavior. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Amalrajrb. Thank you for your work on E. Bhoje Gowd. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

with an h-factor of 31, many unsourced claims (or using sources that fail verification) plus junior awards his notability is dubious. Plus the original editor continues to remove tags.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

E. Bhoje Gowd moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to E. Bhoje Gowd. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it has unreliable sources, and questionable notability which editor has not addressed through multiple iterations.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your suggestion. Amalrajrb (talk) 05:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]