User talk:23r2

Welcome!

Hi 23r2! I noticed your contributions to Westfield Academy, Yeovil and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Preston School—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 12:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Preston School, you may be blocked from editing. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 19:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

finding sources for tyler flynn and the other person idk 23r2 (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

just not the marika person i dont need her 23r2 (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Preston School appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 20:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted your changes again. The headteacher's name needs a source - what you have added does not match the name listed on the DfE record of the school. People listed under alumni should have Wikipedia articles about them already. See WP:WTAF. Tacyarg (talk) 20:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Preston School. Tacyarg (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding your post on my user Talk page, are you also posting as Cockomelon? Tacyarg (talk) 09:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is that? 23r2 (talk) 15:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

_{Note: adding clarification}
Most likely he is referencing User_talk:Tacyarg#Disruptive_Editing_Warning. The message is sent by another user but it ends in your username (see the post) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 15:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok he probably just repeated what i said 23r2 (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

Speedy deletion nomination of Juesao Junior Military Program

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Juesao Junior Military Program, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article, to be accepted, must assert the notability of the subject in a global project, and have citations to neutral, unbiased reliable sources which back up that assertion. An "article" with no sources is barely a draft and has no place here. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Mellk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kuril Islands, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kuril Islands. Mellk (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kuril Islands. CodeTalker (talk) 05:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tsevhu (Artlang) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsevhu (Artlang) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsevhu (Artlang) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

... discospinster _talk 22:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:23r2. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 01:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kuril Islands. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello 23r2! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Ainu Baluchi, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello 23r2! The thread you created at the Teahouse, h1t1 (John Casterline), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello 23r2! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Janine Ling Carr, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kuril Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ainu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kuril Islands. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kuril Islands. Mellk (talk) 00:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts: It seems they are still continuing the same behavior since you blocked them for adding unsourced/poorly sourced content. For example, they keep changing the majority population in the infobox for Kuril Islands even though this is not supported in the main text. Mellk (talk) 00:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Kuril Islands) for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to be unblocked, you must discuss your edits to that article and explain why you are making them. You must also back up your claims with reliable sources. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For instance, a reliable source should be provided to support this change that inserted "Qurali" as a common language and "Quralia" as an alternative name. Mellk (talk) 01:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]