User talk:2001:1970:49DE:8C00:6542:A2E6:E96D:A2B1

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TurboSuperA+ was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Arsenije I, Metropolitan of Zeta instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article seems to be about two topics: Arsenije I and Principality of Zeta. The first already has an article, the 2nd is a redirect.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TurboSuperA+[talk] 05:31, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 2001:1970:49DE:8C00:6542:A2E6:E96D:A2B1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TurboSuperA+[talk] 05:31, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission, September 2025

[edit]

Article Arsenije I already exists as a redirect to Arsenije Sremac. Principality of Zeta is mentioned in this article: List of princes of Zeta#Zeta. If you think Principality of Zeta is notable enough for its own article then I suggest you start a draft article only on the principality. TurboSuperA+[talk] 05:34, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TurboSuperA+ was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Only a single source provided.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TurboSuperA+[talk] 06:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without your IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

If you have any questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CMD (talk) 06:36, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefan, Metropolitan of Cetinje (September 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Carolina2k22 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Carolina2k22(talk) 15:08, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David I, Metropolitan of Zeta (September 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Same issue in this as the other recent metropolitan drafts - a lack of reliable, independent, secondary sources which talk about the subject of the article at length…
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David II, Metropolitan of Zeta (September 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Same problems as for the other metropolitan drafts - a lack of sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:08, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikodim, Metropolitan of Cetinje (September 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This article suffers the same issues as the other Metropolitan articles, a lack of sources proving notability. It is closer than some of the others, but the sources are still mostly mentioning Pahomije in passing, and also there seems to be a discrepancy about the dates he served? You have written 1969-1579 in the article, but the sources say 1968-73? So this will need to be fixed up and the correct dates decided on / correctly sourced before we can continue
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:38, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]