User talk:Векочел
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5. |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBTQ Roman emperors
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:LGBTQ Roman emperors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
[edit]
Hi Векочел, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 06:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Min968
[edit]Hi @Векочел, could you help me review the last two articles about the Ming emperors? It would be a great honor for me if you could. Regard. Min968 (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Do you mean the ones about Tianqi and Chongzhen? They aren't up for GAR right now. Personally I think you need to expand these articles somewhat, and especially focus on the important aspects of their reigns. Gather some sources, as you have been doing for the previous emperors, and look to cover the major social, political, military, and economic developments taking place during their rule. After that I'll be happy to review these articles. Векочел (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел Oh no, I meant there are still two GA reviews left, Yongle and Wanli, and regarding Tianqi and Chongzhen, I will rewrite them in the future. Min968 (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification Min968 and for the articles on emperors Yongle and Wanli, I hope to get to them in the next few days, but they are a bit on the longer side, so a review might take about a week for each. Векочел (talk) 00:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел Oh no, I meant there are still two GA reviews left, Yongle and Wanli, and regarding Tianqi and Chongzhen, I will rewrite them in the future. Min968 (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Han Lin'er
[edit]Hi @Векочел, as per your suggestion, I have expanded the Han Lin'er article. Would you be so kind as to help me review the GA for this article? Min968 (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- I will plan to look at it shortly. Векочел (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел I'm very grateful for your help reviewing my articles over the past while. It has truly given me a lot of motivation. Min968 (talk) 05:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm glad to hear that. My only regret is that my schedule limits how many I can review, but nonetheless it's always a pleasure to read and review these articles. Векочел (talk) 10:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел There's an issue I'm not clear on: whether articles primarily (or entirely) based on non-English sources meet GA standards. For example, I have translated and written a few articles based on Chinese sources such as Ming Shi and Ming Shilu. Min968 (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think English-language sources are definitely preferred to Chinese-language sources. In an FA or GA using 30 sources on the English Wikipedia, you might expect to use 2 or 3 foreign-language sources. Векочел (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел There's an issue I'm not clear on: whether articles primarily (or entirely) based on non-English sources meet GA standards. For example, I have translated and written a few articles based on Chinese sources such as Ming Shi and Ming Shilu. Min968 (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm glad to hear that. My only regret is that my schedule limits how many I can review, but nonetheless it's always a pleasure to read and review these articles. Векочел (talk) 10:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Векочел I'm very grateful for your help reviewing my articles over the past while. It has truly given me a lot of motivation. Min968 (talk) 05:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
WikiProject Crusades
[edit].svg)
|
WikiProject Crusades |
|---|---|
| Hello! I'm here to reach out to you about WikiProject Crusades, a proposed revival and expansion of the Crusades Task Force. I've noticed your contributions to articles about the crusades and wanted to ask for your input regarding such a project and potential membership. For more information about the idea (and to sign up), please visit the page for the project. Thank you! |
🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 15:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Reverosie This sounds very interesting! I do think a revival of WikiProject Crusades would be worthwhile if you can get more users to support it. Векочел (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!!! I’m working very hard on this proposal and I’m hoping to gain more support :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 16:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
Thank you for your heartfelt contributions in evaluating articles nominated for 'Good Article' status. The work of reviewers is often unacknowledged, but the process of examining and collaborating with other editors to improve content demands a great deal of effort. You have dedicated your time and passion to enhancing the quality of content, and for that, you absolutely deserve recognition and appreciation.
The Very Best of Regards, Min968 (talk) 17:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- And thank you Min968 for that barnstar. That means a lot. Looking to more reviews with you in the future. Векочел (talk) 03:18, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
FAC
[edit]@Векочел I'm sorry to bother you, but I'm currently nominating the Jianwen Emperor article for FA. If you have time, could you please stop by and give me some feedback? Min968 (talk) 04:46, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Min968 I will do it when I finish the reviews on the grand secretaries. Векочел (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:22, 31 August 2025 (UTC)