Talk:Urbanization in Australia
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Italic text== rip-off answer sus ==
i would not know how to fix it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.139.19.26 (talk) 05:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 20 November 2025
[edit]
| It has been proposed in this section that Urbanization in Australia be renamed and moved to Urbanisation in Australia. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Urbanization in Australia → Urbanisation in Australia – Per MOS:TIES, use Australian English. Fork99 (talk) 20:44, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Support - not a controversial edit, that could be moved without a discussion imo, but clearly should use Australian English AlbusWulfricDumbledore (talk) 10:14, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed, just wondered why the original creator used this spelling. Haven't had time to look. Fork99 (talk) 18:11, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. TwoNineNineOne (talk) 06:07, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Support This is a no-brainer. We use the spelling "Urbanisation" in Australia. Steelkamp (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Support, WP:TITLEVAR DankJae 02:14, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

