Talk:Twitter under Elon Musk
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Twitter under Elon Musk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
![]() | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
Other discussions: Please see the extensive list of discussions at Twitter § Old moves |
![]() |
|
Merge?
[edit]Merge this article with Twitter Ned1a Wanna talk? 18:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Nedia020415 Why? Maybe with Acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk, if anything. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ah. That seems better to merge. Ned1a Wanna talk? 00:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Merging with Criticism of Twitter makes the most sense to me as it already has a section dedicated to this. Averagecryptid (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Maybe we can merge all of these articles into twitter. Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 22:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- I support a merge to deal with BLP issues, having the subject in the article name is UNDUE. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi sir I want to some help
[edit]Hi sir I want some help 2409:4089:BECB:2756:0:0:29CA:1608 (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you're looking for help pertaining to Elon Musk or Twitter, you're in the wrong place. But if you want to suggest a change to this Wikipedia article, you can do so below. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 16:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Far-right politics and social media
[edit]The article is included in Category:Far-right politics and social media, but unlike other pages like newspapers or blogs X is a social network, it has no webmaster writing anything or any content whatsoever other than what users want to post. And yes, it surely has far-right posts... same as it has far-left, standard right, standard left, center, apolitical, "they can all go to hell", and basically all topics that someone may want to talk about. So we either include this category, along with all the subcategories of Category:Websites by topic (a truly futile task, BTW)... or just ignore them all, and strick to the other categories the article already has. Cambalachero (talk) 17:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Its category "Far-right politics and social media" not "Far-right social media" and there appears to be significant discussion of far-right politics and social media in the article (Account suspensions and reinstatements)... And there is no requirement to include all categories or ignore them. That being said I agree that its not a great category for the page as currently constructed. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Then that would make it a random category intersection of two unrelated criteria. Cambalachero (talk) 14:14, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Horse Eye's Back and Cambalachero: This is specifically about Musk's acquisition and the changes wrought thereafter. I added alt-tech, seeing X has been included within that term by RS (alt is more veritably a reference to the alt-right rather than 'alternative'). Anyone can post on 4/8chan (and other chans), Gab, Truth Social etc. but we do not deny their far/alt-right associations. As it relates to Musk, this appears to be an apt cat. Gotitbro (talk) 07:15, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- The categorization can be referenced? Big deal. I wouldn't expect any less, all categories in all articles must be. That's the bare minimum, but enough in itself, as other criteria may apply. In this case, we don't categorize topics by their opinions over stuff, or because allegations others may do. See Wikipedia:Overcategorization#By opinion or preference of an issue or topic Cambalachero (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hardly an opinion and we are already on a subtopic of a subtopic (acquisition of Twitter>transition under Musk). I wouldn't really term cats here as overcategorization. Gotitbro (talk) 19:43, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- An opinion is an opinion regardless of the support it may have, and we can not categorize based on opinions. And being a parent topic article or a subtopic article is irrelevant, the policy of overcategorization applies either way. Cambalachero (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hardly an opinion and we are already on a subtopic of a subtopic (acquisition of Twitter>transition under Musk). I wouldn't really term cats here as overcategorization. Gotitbro (talk) 19:43, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- The categorization can be referenced? Big deal. I wouldn't expect any less, all categories in all articles must be. That's the bare minimum, but enough in itself, as other criteria may apply. In this case, we don't categorize topics by their opinions over stuff, or because allegations others may do. See Wikipedia:Overcategorization#By opinion or preference of an issue or topic Cambalachero (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
"The Great X-odus" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect The Great X-odus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 31 § The Great X-odus until a consensus is reached. Belbury (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)