Talk:Trash stream

Ai Image

[edit]

SecondThirdAndSixth, just because no one did that doesn't mean you can't do that. Images created by artificial intelligence under US law have a free face, which means they can be used on Wikipedia. For lack of a real picture of a trash stream and the inability to give it, since trash streams do not go out under a free license, a drawing generated by a neural network is the optimal and pervasive option. Stop canceling the edit, your actions are unjustified. Mr. Lechkar, Jpgordon, Giraffedata, invite you to discuss. Нейроманьяк (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My actions are totally justified. You are even can't correctly format the image in the article. Adding AI-generated content is still nonsense SecondThirdAndSixth (talk) 11:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What kind of forbidding rule do you refer to? You only act in your opinion and nothing more. Нейроманьяк (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No SecondThirdAndSixth (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trash_stream#c-SecondThirdAndSixth-20250713115200-%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BA-20250713111300 SecondThirdAndSixth (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree to the rule. Нейроманьяк (talk) 12:11, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
AI images cannot be examples of the subject matter of the article, at least because they are not real SecondThirdAndSixth (talk) 11:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I won 😁 SecondThirdAndSixth (talk) 02:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a game, you're being unencyclopedic, you'll agree on the rule. Нейроманьяк (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am encyclopedic and objective. I guess if you have nothing to say on the topic, the topic is closed SecondThirdAndSixth (talk) 07:59, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Send a rule that you can't use AI images. Нейроманьяк (talk) 09:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strange formatting

[edit]

Some of the sections in this article do seem a bit off to me, almost like they were written using ChatGPT or another form of AI. Does anybody else notice this? Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 18:01, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 October 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Speedy close. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Trash streamTrash streaming – The article covers the general phenomenon rather than individual streams: "Trash streaming" is the more widely used term in reliable sources.

French Wikipedia article on Trash streaming

France Inter podcast

Euronews article on Jean Pormanove case

DW video on Trash streaming Trump2029 (talk) 18:20, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.