Talk:Tigger's Honey Hunt

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Untitled

[edit]

B-class, tells the standard info about the game and has info about primary game play, needs development or other info to help make it A-class. (Floppydog66 (talk) 19:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Peer review

[edit]

Tigger's Honey Hunt

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I have expanded the article and would like some feedback on its current state.

Thanks, IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 18:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

[edit]

Comments after a quick skim:

  • MOS:VGGP says that gameplay sections need to be cited. There should be a citation at the end of each paragraph, minimum.
  • The lead should include information about its development, gameplay, and reception. In short, it should be a summary of the entire article.

Hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Z1720,
Thank you for your comments. These both should be resolved now. Would you mind taking another look?
Cheers,
~~ IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

[edit]
  • Please add alt texts to all images for accessibility.
  • There are five Citation Needed tags that need fixing.
  • There are three paragraphs that need citations and don't have them.
  • "was later released for the Game Boy Color, with different mini games but otherwise sharing much of the same story." needs a citation.
  • What makes GameRaveTV a reliable source.
  • It should be made consistent in sources of whether you either use the url as the website or the website name.
  • Please archive all online sources.
  • Please consistently use dates written out or with all numbers, not both.
  • Some release dates are missing inline citations.
  • Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @History6042,
    Thank you for the detailed feedback. I believe I have solved most of these issues now. Could you please take a look when you have a chance? Cheers,IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't have time right now but I think I can check tomorrow. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tigger's Honey Hunt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: IngeniousPachyderm (talk · contribs) 22:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: PresN (talk · contribs) 16:12, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, reviewing this article. I review GAs by making a list of things I see as I read through, rather than with a template. I'll make minor edits myself.

  • General note: paragraphs should be, generally, 4-6 sentences. 1 or 2-sentence paragraphs read choppily and lose the flow between concepts. The lede, gameplay, plot, and release all have a few too-short paragraphs; these should pretty much all just be merged with the paragraph above them.
  • Lede calls the game both a platform game and a platformer; should pick one (I guess platformer since that's what the article is titled)
  • Link 2.5D in the lede like in Gameplay
  • Link Tigger in the lede and in Gameplay
  • "...a tie-in for The Tigger Movie, which released six months prior." - it didn't release itself, and should mention that it was a theatrical release -> "...a tie-in for The Tigger Movie, which was released in theaters six months prior."
  • Gameplay should not rely on context from the lede as to what we're talking about, e.g. it should start like "Tigger's Honey Hunt is a video game divided between six platformer levels and three minigames."
  • Carrying on from that, Gameplay should expand on what 2.5D means in this case rather than just dropping in the term as there's multiple things called "2.5D", e.g. something like "The platform levels have Tigger traverse a two-dimensional path, viewed from the side in 2.5D."
  • Link Pooh in gameplay
  • Elaborate on what the Time Trial challenges are- do you do a little race inside the level, or do you get to try to complete the whole level in some time, or what?
  • The "learn new abilities" is split/repeated between paragraphs 1 and 3; I'd move/merge the "Tigger can later learn the ability to bounce higher and briefly hover in mid-air, allowing players to replay levels..." sentence down with the rest of it in the last sentence of paragraph 3.
  • Link PlayStation, Windows, Nintendo 64
  • Winnie/Tigger don't need to be linked in plot, as they should be linked in Gameplay when first mentioned
  • Sounds like the second paragraph in plot (which as per above should be combined with the first) happens at the end of the game, which should be made explicit
  • Link Disney Interactive, NewKidCo in development
  • "The game began development as a PlayStation game..." -> "The game began development as a PlayStation title in early 2000"
  • I don't honestly think it's even worth having the gamerankings average if it's only based on 2 reviews
  • You don't need to put every single review in the VG Reviews template; the guideline is to aim for 7ish, 10 at most. A lot of the minor ones should be cut from the table.
  • On the flip side, there shouldn't be any reviews in the table that aren't used in the text; I see several that aren't. This can be solved by either cutting them or adding them to the text; given the size of the section, I'd recommend adding them to the text.
  • Not a GA criteria, but the reception section reads a bit like "reviewer A said X. Reviewer B said Y." instead of grouping similar concerns together; see MOS:VGREC for more
  • Ref 11 seems to be a duplicate of ref 45
  • Not clear that ReviewCorner.com is a reliable source

That's it! It's pretty solid overall, just needs some polishing. --PresN 16:12, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN Thank you for your review! Below are my responses:
  • I've merged the first two paragraphs in the lead, but I may still need to expand the third one.
  • I've changed it to just "Platformer" in the lead
  • Linked to 2.5D and Tigger in the lead and removed the links to them in the Gameplay section (I believe that's what you're suggesting, since I think you're only supposed to wikilink to something once per article).
  • "...a tie-in for The Tigger Movie, which released six months prior."
    • Changed to "a tie-in for The Tigger Movie, which released theatrically six months prior."
  • Gameplay should not rely on context from the lede as to what we're talking about, e.g. it should start like "Tigger's Honey Hunt is a video game divided between six platformer levels and three minigames."
    • Done
  • Added a short expansion of what 2.5D means
  • Wikilinked to Pooh in gameplay and removed from Plot
  • Elaborated on Time Trials
  • Re-structured the learned abilities sentences.
  • Again, should PS, N64, and Windows be linked to again if they were already linked in the lead?
  • Elaborated that second paragraph in Plot is regarding the game's ending.
  • Again, NewKidCo and Disney Interactive are linked in the lead.
  • "The game began development as a PlayStation game..." -> "The game began development as a PlayStation title in early 2000"
    • Done
  • I've removed the GameRankings sources from the Reception table.
  • I've removed the smaller publications from the Reception table. I've also made sure the remaining publications are referenced in the body of the article.
  • I've tried to improve the flow of the reception section as per MOS:VGREC. Please let me know what you think.f
  • Fixed duplicate reference to N64 Magazine.
  • ReviewCorner.com has been removed as a source.
Thank you! IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • You know, I've thought forever that the rule was to re-link terms, and duplink tools don't count repeating a link from the lede in the body as a duplicate, , but looking at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking you're right that the other way around is fine, it just says no more than once per major section. So you're right that you can stick with just the links in the lede.
  • Reception does look better now!
  • I think add a sentence or two to the start of the second paragraph of the lede summarizing the development section (maybe something like "The game began development as a PlayStation title by Doki Denki in early 2000 with a nine-month deadline. The Nintendo 64 version was subcontracted to Rivage Games, which completed the port in only four months.")
  • The other changes look good, I think add that one addition and I'll close this nomination. --PresN 04:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @PresN Thank you! I have expanded the second paragraph of the introduction now. Let me know what you think.
    Thanks IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 05:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Article just promoted to GA. This game received the BAFTA Interactive Entertainment Award in the category of Children's Entertainment in 2001.
Improved to Good Article status by IngeniousPachyderm (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 18:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @IngeniousPachyderm: Article recently upgraded to GA and no QPQ is required. I linked to BAFTA Interactive Entertainment Awards in the hook. There is an error in the page as reference 7 is a harv error. Fix that and I will approve the hook. Jon698 (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon698: I think it should be fixed now thanks to @LastJabberwocky. Thanks! IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Passed. Jon698 (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]