Talk:Ivan Ančić

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ivan Ančić article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. Catholicism Low‑importance Catholic Church portal Ivan Ančić is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Draft articles Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page); Kazimieras Vasiliauskas (monsignor) Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles Latin Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Former countries: Italian historical states / Ottoman Empire This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project. This article is supported by the Italian historical states task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Low-importance). Bosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Ivan Ančić is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Croatia Low‑importance Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	Ivan Ančić is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
	Ivan Ančić has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 6, 2025 Good article nominee Listed June 27, 2025 Peer review Reviewed August 9, 2025 Featured article candidate Not promoted A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 27, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ivan Ančić was the first Bosnian Franciscan to use the Latin script to write in his native language? Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Ivan Ančić

• ... that Ivan Ančić was the first Bosnian Franciscan to use the Latin script for writing in his native language? Source: Mihanović-Salopek, Hrvojka (2006). "Ivan Ančić kao promicatelj europskoga humaističkog civilizacijskog kruga na prostorima osmanlijske vlasti u BiH" [Ivan Ančić as a promoter of the European humanist civilisation circle in the areas of Ottoman rule in Bosnia and Herzegovina]. Dani Hvarskoga kazališta: Građa i rasprave o hrvatskoj književnosti i kazalištu (in Croatian). 32 (1): 105–121. Retrieved 10 February 2024.; Tvorić Kučko, Alojzija (2015). "Stil tekstova u Ogledalu misničkom Ivana Ančića" [The style of the texts in Ivan Ančić's Ministerial Mirror]. Kroatologija (in Croatian). 5 (1): 105–121. Retrieved 10 February 2024.
  • ALT1: ... that Ivan Ančić, a Bosnian Franciscan, hoped to become the bishop of Duvno, but failed? Source: Mihanović-Salopek, Hrvojka (2006). "Ivan Ančić kao promicatelj europskoga humaističkog civilizacijskog kruga na prostorima osmanlijske vlasti u BiH" [Ivan Ančić as a promoter of the European humanist civilisation circle in the areas of Ottoman rule in Bosnia and Herzegovina]. Dani Hvarskoga kazališta: Građa i rasprave o hrvatskoj književnosti i kazalištu (in Croatian). 32 (1): 105–121. Retrieved 10 February 2024.
  • Reviewed:

5x expanded by Governor Sheng (talk). Self-nominated at 06:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ivan Ančić; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

• Article 5x expanded on 7 February, 3 days before nomination. The article is long enough, is well written, and is presentable. I am unable to verify sources due to their language, but the referencing is consistent and thorough and I will take the hook's fact on good faith. The hook fact is present in the article, is relevant, and is interesting. I definitely prefer ALT0 to ALT1. Thanks for a really intriguing article! Fritzmann (message me) 14:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hi Fritzmann! I can help; I speak Croatian. First source for ALT0 unambiguously confirms the hook (p.109) and the second states that he is "among the first" (p.51). Hope this helps! ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! Hook is definitely good to promote then. Forgot to mention in the review, but the image is properly licensed; it is a little tough to see at 100px, but if an imaged hook is needed I think this one would be sufficient. Fritzmann (message me) 17:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ivan Ančić/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Governor Sheng (talk · contribs) 18:08, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: EF5 (talk · contribs) 16:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the late review, I was in Cincinnati all weekend and wasn't able to get access to a computer. I'll finish the review today to compensate. :) E_F⁵ 16:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review, I'm a bit late:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   See below.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   See below. Earwig only shows a 6.5% similarity ratio, which is far below copyright-vio levels.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   All good here, seems to cover everything.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No neutrality issues.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No protections, no disputes, no edit warring.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Image used is tagged right and has alt text.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Why is a paragraph-sized lead section split up into two paragraphs?
• The pronunciation of his name is uncited.
• "In 1656, Ančić asked di Gaieta, to return to his homeland" should be changed to "In 1656, Ančić asked di Gaieta to return to his homeland"
• "At a chapter held in Kraljeva Sutjeska friary held on 28 August 1669" remove the second "held"
• "In the scope of the task" Not sure what this means.

@Governor Sheng: That's all I've got. :) E_F⁵ 14:31, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made the amandments. Governor Sheng (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Peer review

Ivan Ančić

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I want it to become a featured or at least an A-class article.

Thanks, Governor Sheng (talk) 12:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the lead a bit, it repeated "Duvno" a lot of times. I also removed the claim about him being the first to write in Latin script, because that honour belongs to Marko Marulić, who predates Ančić by some 150 years (if I am not mistaken). TurboSuperA+_(connect) 06:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ančić was the first Bosnian Franciscan to do so. I see that I failed to mention that! Thank you so much. There's a whole phenomenon of Bosnian Franciscan Literature, which many consider the first standardised South Slavic language. Also, didn't know that about Marulić. :) Governor Sheng (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]