Talk:Gaeul (singer)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| On 13 December 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kim Ga-eul (singer) to Gaeul (singer). The result of the discussion was moved. |
edit the title
[edit]I want to change the title to Gaeul (Singer) and then submit it, but the title change permissions are unavailable. StarEditor92 (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 13 December 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 23:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Kim Ga-eul (singer) โ Gaeul (singer) โ She is known mononymously[1][2][3]. I don't think she is the primary topic for the name, so I think Gaeul should redirect to Ga-eul, but I am open to discussing it here. As it stands she is not known by her full name so it will need to be moved. orangesclub ๐ 11:32, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per nom โ Paper9oll (๐ โข ๐) 11:35, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- is there an update for this discussion? StarEditor92 (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- @StarEditor92 As per the notice above, requested move discussions are normally open for seven days and are closed by an uninvolved editor. Since you have contributed to the article and participated in the discussion, you would be considered involved and therefore cannot close the RM or move the page yourself. Additionally, RM discussions are not forums. There is no requirement to reply to or endorse every comment or !vote unless you are presenting a new argument, particularly in response to an oppose. Repeated acknowledgements do not affect consensus and are generally unnecessary. Please also be mindful of WP:OWN. Contributing to an article does not confer control over its title or outcome of a requested move, which is determined by consensus. As such, there is no need to push for a status update; the process should be allowed to run its course. โ Paper9oll (๐ โข ๐) 12:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for this information; I wasn't aware of it. I apologize, as I'm a new user of this page. StarEditor92 (talk) 12:23, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- @StarEditor92 No worries, just wanted to let you know. โ Paper9oll (๐ โข ๐) 12:29, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for this information; I wasn't aware of it. I apologize, as I'm a new user of this page. StarEditor92 (talk) 12:23, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- @StarEditor92 As per the notice above, requested move discussions are normally open for seven days and are closed by an uninvolved editor. Since you have contributed to the article and participated in the discussion, you would be considered involved and therefore cannot close the RM or move the page yourself. Additionally, RM discussions are not forums. There is no requirement to reply to or endorse every comment or !vote unless you are presenting a new argument, particularly in response to an oppose. Repeated acknowledgements do not affect consensus and are generally unnecessary. Please also be mindful of WP:OWN. Contributing to an article does not confer control over its title or outcome of a requested move, which is determined by consensus. As such, there is no need to push for a status update; the process should be allowed to run its course. โ Paper9oll (๐ โข ๐) 12:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- is there an update for this discussion? StarEditor92 (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- I have retargeted Gaeul to Ga-eul. If there is sufficient consensus that the singer is the primary topic for the name "Gaeul", then the article may simply be moved to Gaeul rather than Gaeul (singer). Until then, the status quo is that there is no primary topic. GTrang (talk) 18:06, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- This is actually a very good idea thank you for your suggestion she's indeed known for her name gaeul not her full name kim gaeul but i thought they may be an article with gaeul so i add gaeul (singer) if there's not ill appreciate it if you can move it thank you StarEditor92 (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Support subject is not known by her full name. RachelTensions (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Support. She is known as Gaeul, not her full name. Random86 (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes i know i think it will be better to move it to Gaeul (Singer) StarEditor92 (talk) 03:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- great suggestion StarEditor92 (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
gaeul Television shows
[edit]2023 Han Moon-chul's Dashcam Review as guest ref 'ํ๋ธ๋ฆฌ' ์์ด๋ธ ๊ฐ์ ์ถ์ฐโฆ์ผ์ผ ์๋ฌด ์ ์๋์ผ๋ก ๋ณ์ [TV์คํฌ]
2025 Tails of Tales as guest ref heraldpop.com/article/10461921
2025 Stars' Top Recipe at Fun-Staurant as as guest ref ์์ด๋ธ ๊ฐ์, ์๋ฆฌ ์ค๋ ฅ์? "ํ์ ์ข์ํด, ๋์ฅ์ฐ๊ฐ ์์ฃผ ๋์ฌ"(ํธ์คํ ๋)
The information currently in the article is incorrect, and @Paper9oll not permitted to revert without consensus. Therefore, I request community consensus to correct the information on the article talk page.โ
thank you.
StarEditor92 (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- @StarEditor92 You were clearly informed that no guesting is allowed as per consensus at WT:KO so don't editing disruptively by WP:IDHT. โ Paper9oll (๐ โข ๐) 17:46, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- okay thank you for make it clear for me I appreciate it StarEditor92 (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
