Talk:Dungka!

  1. Home
  2. Wiki
Good articleDungka! has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2025Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 30, 2025.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a scene of a man eating a crab in the music video for "Dungka!" symbolised a crab mentality among Filipinos?

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
A crab
A crab
  • ... that a scene of a man eating a crab (example pictured) in the music video for SB19's song, "Dungka!", was used as a symbol for crab mentality among people?
  • Source: "He plays the MV's antagonist as the representation of crab mentality (hence his meals of crabs at the start of the video)." ([1]); "He is first seen feasting on crabs, representing the crab mentality present among Filipinos. ([2]); "There was also a particular scene wherein he was eating crabs that can be a symbolism of Filipinos having crab mentality wherein they pull others down." ([3])
Converted from a redirect by Relayed (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

– Relayed (t • c) 13:52, 8 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

, good article. I don't see issues. Promoted. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reviewing the hook, Wikipediæ philosophia! Relayed (talk • contribs) 15:27, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]
Passed. ROY is WAR Talk! 12:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dungka!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Relayed (talk · contribs) 11:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Royiswariii (talk · contribs) 09:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article, Relayed. I will update you once I review and my suggestions or recommendations. ROY is WAR Talk! 09:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

[edit]
Good Article Status - Review Criteria
Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

  1. Well-written:
    2. (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
    (c) it contains no original research; and
    (d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[3] and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. [4]
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. [5]
    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[6]

Notes

  1. ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
  2. ^ Footnotes must be used for in-line citations.
  3. ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
  4. ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
  5. ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
  6. ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

Review

[edit]
  1. Well-written:
    2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) good led section Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) It is aligned on MoS. Pass Pass
  2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
    3. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The reviewer has left no comments here Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) All source that used on the article are reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) no OR which is good. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) It is low or no copyvio and plagiarism are detected. Pass Pass
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) There's a missing section which is the "on popular culture" or "In other media," which I found this article [4]. Done! Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) It is no unnecessarily added on the article which is good. Pass Pass
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
    5. Notes Result
    So far, I don't see anything bias words encountered. Pass Pass
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. Comment Result
    Relatively new and no sign of edit warring or ongoing Pass Pass
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) All fair use images and audios are okay. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) The reviewer has left no comments here Pass Pass

Result

[edit]
Result Notes
Pass Pass Relayed, I finish my review, if you have any questions or suggestions that could be work, please add on the discussion section.

Discussion

[edit]
Hi, Roy! Thanks for doing the review. I'll look into your comment shortly. Relayed (talk • contribs) 14:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Royiswariii: Hi, Roy! Your comment has been actioned. While adding it, I also came across a feature for Fatal Fury. However, having a separate "In other media" is not feasible at the moment, since it would be too short. I think the added info could fall under "Music video and promotion" for now. Let me know if you have anything else. Relayed (talk • contribs) 18:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Relayed Great! I noticed the Dungka § Monthly charts section, please wikilink the Top P-pop Songs and it can be pass this article. ROY is WAR Talk! 07:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Royiswariii: Hi again, Roy! It's now wikilinked. Relayed (talk • contribs) 07:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Relayed Great, it is passed now. To be honest, I love this song and I can't wait to see this on DYK Main Page. ROY is WAR Talk! 12:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Re: Crab mentality

[edit]
Writers highlighted a scene from the video where the antagonist was eating a crab, which they interpreted as a symbol for crab mentality among Filipinos.

I encountered this among some of my fellow Filipino colleagues, but I always dismissed it as a form of bias on my part. Is there any good evidence that the crab mentality is more predominant in this community as opposed to others? Having seen it up close and personal, I honestly don't know. Is there something about the culture of the Philippines that would make the crab mentality more noticeable, or is this just something that every human culture has to some extent or another? Viriditas (talk) 22:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I just remembered reading a book about ten years ago that argued that marginalized communities do have a history of crab mentality, although even that could be a generalization. The book talked about how some Black Americans struggled to get out of the ghetto and in some cases their efforts were discouraged and looked down upon, possibly because it was seen as becoming "whiter", I don't know. I believe there are similar stories for other communities as well. Viriditas (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]