Talk:Dianthera angusta
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 2 November 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Justicia angusta to Dianthera angusta. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Notes
[edit]Narrow-leaved waterillow? FloridaArmy (talk) 18:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 2 November 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Though there were just comments, there were no votes also, hence the move. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Justicia angusta → Dianthera angusta – This is a synonym per POWO. UtherSRG (talk) 16:02, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- Also per COL, GBIF, and WFO. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:07, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- I note, however, that the remaining links in the taxonbar refer to it under the current name, so maybe this should be more of a discussion in the article, or discussion in the article and a move. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:09, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- iNaturalist is the only one of the remaining taxonbar links that I have any expectation of being up-to-date with recent taxonomic changes. iNat generally follows POWO, but has explicitly rejected doing so for J./D. americana (see here). One comment in the iNat discussion notes that "POWO's treatment is nonsense" based on POWO having a Justicia species that should be included in Dianthera if Dianthera is recognized (although that particular species doesn't have a legitimate combination in Dianthera). Plantdrew (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I note, however, that the remaining links in the taxonbar refer to it under the current name, so maybe this should be more of a discussion in the article, or discussion in the article and a move. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:09, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- No problem. Theroadislong (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Post move discussion
[edit]I've updated the article to reflect the move, and wrote a small bit about it being placed in the two genera. As this is such a small article, I don't want a taxonomic argument to out weigh the rest of the information, but it probably could be expanded. Plantdrew's response above leads me to think this might eventually move back to Justicia, so maybe some indication of such would be good? Also, I bet there should be some discussion on one or both of the genera articles about the current mess... - UtherSRG (talk) 15:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
