Talk:B. R. Ambedkar

Collapsing shells

[edit]

This seems to me unnecessary since a list of WikiProjects near the top of the Talkpage makes it obvious that the topic has more than usual notability (or in other cases not much notability). Johnsoniensis (talk) 00:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 September 2025

[edit]

Replace

[edit]

Dr Ambedkar was given the title minister of law not law and justice because the title "minister of law and justice" was bought in after 1951 so please change it to "minister of law" 202.148.60.250 (talk) 12:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grammatical Error

[edit]

Under the section 'India's Constitution', the following sentence is ungrammatical:

"Indian constitution guarantees and protections for a wide range of civil liberties for individual citizens, including freedom of religion, the abolition of untouchability, and the outlawing of all forms of discrimination." (italics mine)

It should read:

"Indian constitution guarantees protections for a wide range of civil liberties for individual citizens, including freedom of religion, the abolition of untouchability, and the outlawing of all forms of discrimination."

Or,

"Indian constitution guarantees and protects a wide range of civil liberties for individual citizens, including freedom of religion, the abolition of untouchability, and the outlawing of all forms of discrimination." Homo Idiotus (talk) 05:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another Grammatical Error

[edit]

Under the section 'India's Constitution', the following long line has an incorrect use of the article "an", which should be "a":

"Steven Calabresi has voiced agreement with Martha C. Nussbaum's assessment of the Indian constitution as "Ambedkar's constitution," on account of the Supreme Court of India having evolved away from judicial restraint and legal positivism favored and successfully executed into the Constitution in 1950 by Jawaharlal Nehru and leaders of India's anti-colonial nationalist movement who held sway in the Constituent Assembly of India to an purposive approach by which the court rules today, whereby it is the final arbiter of the Constitution's meaning and its interpretations are binding on the executive and legislative branches of the government." (emphasis mine)

Recommended change: "...to a purposive approach by which..."

Homo Idiotus (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]