Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
This page is related to a topic subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances)
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
Aaron Bandler (July 25, 2024). "Wikipedia Editors Title Article "Gaza Genocide"". The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Retrieved August 7, 2024. Interestingly, there is a Wikipedia article titled "Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel" and there was a brief discussion on if it should be renamed to "Genocide in the 2023-led Hamas attack on Israel" that appears to have stalled out.
While I'm not opposed to changing the title, this suggestions seems clunky. Do you have a rational for it?
I would point to the Ukraine article, and the former name of the Gaza article as examples of use using the structure "Allegations/Accusations of Genocide in Event". -- Cdjp1 (talk) 09:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. I'm seeing a clear consensus that the article not be moved. Extermination, whilst awful, is not the same as genocide per the ICC. Most commenters agree that the use of "Allegations" is found in the majority reliable sources, and that to move it would be undue and wikivoice per WP:NPOV. (closed by non-admin page mover) CoconutOctopustalk20:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: This proposal has no chance of being agreed, and should just be closed as an obvious non-starter. Two key words in the nominator's rationale are "accused" and "implying". The word "accusation" is merely a synonym of "allegation", so it supports the current title. We should also not decide on our own that someone is "implying" something that they are not saying directly. None of that is evidence that a consensus of independent reliable sources has agreed to refer to the actions as "genocide". — BarrelProof (talk) 21:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per BarrelBroof and TRCRF22, and as noted, the nom's own words which are entirely in line with allegations. --MYCETEAE 🍄🟫—talk18:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Although I understand the intention here, "allegations" continues to be the correct term. Gaza genocide is backed by more scholarly research and is more accepted by the international community. Genocide against Israel or Ukraine, as two examples, are largely etched in the context of war and have not been confirmed by international bodies. PickleG13 (talk) 20:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NCENPOV, a contentious word such as "genocide" should be generally accepted by reliable sources. According to WP:TITLEWARRIOR#Personal_definitions, the sources themselves should use the term, we can't evaluate sources' descriptions of the event to determine if said event was a genocide. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply)21:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Were the UK and Germany committing genocide against each other by mass bombing, killing far more people than this, in the Second World War? No. Genocide is a very specific thing. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If the title is changed, then this article may as well not exist, because it is entirely about the question of whether the attack was genocide or not rather than the attack itself. Therefore, if it is no longer a question, having an article like this would violate NPOV. It is a matter for a merge nomination, not a move request. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:18, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure where I ever insinuated that. But this is about what reliable sources say, not what any one person believes. Wikipedia cannot override reliable sources to establish its own separate viewpoint on a topic. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Without absolutely concrete evidence, these can only be classed as allegations. Mass murder and genocide are not the same thing, however appalling the former may be. The murder of 1,200 people cannot possibly be taken as the destruction of a nation or ethnic group, which is what genocide is, or even the attempt at such. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.