User talk:AimanAbir18plus

Welcome message

Hello, AimanAbir18plus, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Peaceray (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Service award

This editor is a
Yeoman Editor
and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

I notice you've been here a year as of the 10th and have over 3,000 edits, so you are entitled to display this service award on your user page. Cheers! Skyerise (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Well, technically it requires 4,000 edits, but most editors have made edits to some article or other that has since been deleted, or have made edits on sister projects, which are allowed to be counted in ones total.) Skyerise (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I really appreciate this. I promise, I will be more responsible to my contributions on Wikipedia. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 07:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

For your work on articles on occult fascism and terrorism. RKT7789 (talk) 04:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to God in Abrahamic religions, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Remember: Wikipedia is not censored. GenoV84 (talk) 19:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Belbury (talk) 07:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently removed content from Depictions of Muhammad without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 18:49, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please use edit summaries?

Thanks. PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— EarthDude (Talk) 06:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello! I have reverted a recent change of yours, which placed the lead image of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh at a separate section with a blank edit summary. Could you please explain the rationale of that edit? — EarthDude (Talk) 06:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to other such organizations' articles. Image placed in the article per context. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 12:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I see from your edit, you had placed it in the uniform section, supposedly to show the new uniform of the organization. But there is already an image there which serves that exact purpose, so I don't understand the need to take the lead image and replace a perfectly appropriate image with that one. I think the current lead image is a perfect representation of the organization and abides by MOS:LEADIMAGE. — EarthDude (Talk) 15:24, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead img is supposed to have been in the infobox. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 11:29, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. Anyhow, the infobox already has the saffron flag and it can't contain two or more images. — EarthDude (Talk) 18:21, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to God in Abrahamic religions, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. We strive for articles with an impartial tone that document and explain major points of view, giving due weight for their prominence. We avoid advocacy, and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas, there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others, we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy with citations based on reliable sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is about a living person. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong on Wikipedia. GenoV84 (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tanbiruzzaman. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. While this was not a recent contribution, I'm talking about this edit. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 11:47, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Round city

Why the title lengthening? Seems gratuitous. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:American Association of Biological Anthropologists logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Association of Biological Anthropologists logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Temple Institute logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Temple Institute logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Symbol of the terrorist organization 764.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Symbol of the terrorist organization 764.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

India

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. This is your second warning. Please don't do this again. India is a Wikipedia featured article. That means it has undergone community examination of and consensus about itscontents. Please read WP:FAOWN, WP:BRD and WP:ONUS. You are required to open a discussion thread on Talk:India and garner a new consensus on the image. Such discussions can take time to conclude, sometimes weeks if not months. So be warned. However, if you directly edit the page again after being reverted twice I will request administrative help. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:18, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS I apologize sincerely for incorrectly transcribing your user name in the edit summary of my revert on India. The error was inadvertent. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:48, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]