User talk:Cdjp1

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Expert opinions on the Allegations of genocide in the October 7 attacks?

[edit]

You probably have a better grasp of the non-legal scholarship, so: do you think there is a place for a sister page for Template:Expert opinions in the Gaza genocide debate, or is the discussion still localised enough that there’s no point? FortunateSons (talk) 12:58, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FortunateSons Ive not kept up with it as much, i have a couple papers at hand that deal with October 7 and Gaza in tandem, which aren't used in the article yet. But based on the article's length, there should be easy enough room to include all pieces discussing that matter (that I know of) within it. Though of course, if there is more than i thought, it's easy enough to spin up a template page. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 13:16, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you very much! FortunateSons (talk) 07:56, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a few more sources to further reading, they should be incorporated into the article, but at least they are flagged so people know about them for now. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 08:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I've added Ambos as well, I think you got most of the other ones. I'm not sure about this (warning, it's pretty graphic), what do you think? It's by the Jerusalem Institute of Justice, whose wiki article is of no help. FortunateSons (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the consideration of a graphic warning. The JIJ article needs more than a little work. I haven't heard of the JIJ before, so I can't comment on their "reliability".
The report, from a skim through, could possibly be used, some of it's citations are unfortunate (Screams without words article, with some of the information in the article being dismantled in late 2024), though with the report being from March 2024, it's not surprising, and the information it is used for hasn't been part of what was disproven. Another couple being MEMRI, though I don't have the requisite skills to comment on the validity of MEMRI's translations. Most of the citations it provides are what we would consider Generally Reliable.
I won't stand in the way of adding it if you think it's worthwhile. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate you taking a look! I think I'll add it to further reading for now :) FortunateSons (talk) 09:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We seem to have been overtaken by events FortunateSons (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Usuable, with attribution, to expand info on genocidal sexual violence. I do wonder if now that there's been this submission the Israeli State will allow UN organs to investigate the matter, as they previously blocked the UN which impacted the conclusions of that report. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 14:57, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know, thanks. I would really be in favour of that as well, but honestly, based on the way that the relationship between the UN and Israel has further deteriorated since October 7, I’m not holding my breath. FortunateSons (talk) 14:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately I'm of the same opinion. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/Japan (Coast Guard)

[edit]

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/Japan (Coast Guard) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]


June 2025 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Cdjp1 for collecting more than 139.0 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's JUN25 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 9,500 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer Alt ■ 15:49, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]