Draft talk:Independent Counter-Strike Tournaments

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Question about the review of my Draft:Independent Counter-Strike Tournaments

[edit]

Thank you for your detailed feedback on my draft, "Independent Counter-Strike Tournaments." I have read your comments carefully and would appreciate some further guidance to help me improve the article.

I understand the concerns you've raised about the draft resembling an essay and showing characteristics of AI-generated text. I want to clarify that I have been writing and revising the draft myself. However, I see now that my writing style might have unintentionally included the issues you pointed out, such as a promotional tone or speculative statements.

To help me correct this, could you possibly point to one or two specific sentences or paragraphs that you feel are the most problematic?

An example of what you consider "essay-like writing" or "editorializing" would be incredibly helpful for me to understand the required neutral, encyclopedic tone.

Similarly, an example of a "vague" or "generic" statement would help me make the language more precise and fact-based.

I will re-examine my work based on your advice and focus on strictly summarizing information from reliable secondary sources to avoid any close paraphrasing or original research.

Thank you again for your time and for helping me learn the standards. Sonkarkal (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]