Draft:Vinoth Rathinasamy
| Submission declined on 26 July 2025 by Afstromen (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 19 July 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 26 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 July 2025 by RangersRus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by RangersRus 26 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 July 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 32 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 July 2025 by Thilsebatti (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Thilsebatti 33 days ago. | |
Comment: Cheers, can you explain how the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article per WP:FILMMAKER? Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:40, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources still contains lots of 404 page not found, do not submit again without actually fixing the broken/invalid sources KylieTastic (talk) 17:23, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Vinoth Rathinasamy | |
|---|---|
 Cinematographer Vinoth Rathinasamy | |
| Occupation | Cinematographer |
| Years active | 2015–present |
| Known for | Nedunalvaadai, MGR Magan, Kadamaiyai Sei |
Vinoth Rathinasamy is an Indian cinematographer who works predominantly in Tamil films. His work in films such as Chennai Ungalai Anbudan Varaverkirathu, Munnodi[1], Nedunalvaadai[2], MGR Magan[3], Bumper[4], and Aalambana[5] garnered recognition.
Early life
[edit]Vinoth Rathinasamy was born in Nallavinayagapuram, a village in Sirkali taluk, Mayiladuthurai district, Tamil Nadu. He completed his B.Sc. in Physics at A.V.C. College, Mayiladuthurai, and earned a Postgraduate Diploma in Media Presentation from Loyola College, Chennai. He worked as an assistant to renowned cinematographer R. D. Rajasekhar before debuting as a cinematographer in the film Chennai Ungalai Anbudan Varaverkirathu.
Career
[edit]Vinoth Rathinasamy has received attention in prominent Indian media for his visual storytelling. His work in Nedunalvaadai earned praise from critics, with The Hindu highlighting the film’s cinematography.[2] In an article by the Deccan Chronicle, he was lauded for his visuals in Bumper, which added to his reputation.[6] The Times of India also referred to him as "Nedunalvaadai-fame" in coverage of MGR Magan.[7]
Filmography
[edit]| Year | Title | Director | Language |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Chennai Ungalai Anbudan Varaverkirathu | Marudhu Pandiyan | Tamil |
| 2017 | Munnodi | SPTA Kumar | Tamil |
| 2019 | Nedunalvaadai | Selvakannan | Tamil |
| 2021 | MGR Magan | Ponram | Tamil |
| 2022 | Kadamaiyai Sei | Venkat Raghavan | Tamil |
| 2023 | Bumper | M. Selvakumar | Tamil |
| 2025 | Aalambana | Pari K. Vijay | Tamil |
References
[edit]- ^ "Munnodi Tamil Movie Review". The Times of India. 20 February 2017. Retrieved 18 July 2025.
- ^ a b "Nedunalvaadai Movie Review". The Hindu. 20 March 2019. Retrieved 18 July 2025.
- ^ "MGR Magan Movie Review: A Predictable Rural Entertainer". Cinema Express. 4 November 2021. Retrieved 18 July 2025.
- ^ "Bumper Movie Review: A Lottery Win That Leads Nowhere". The New Indian Express. 8 July 2023. Retrieved 18 July 2025.
- ^ "Aalambana Movie Review". OTTplay. 15 December 2023. Retrieved 18 July 2025.
- ^ "Vinoth Ratnasamy lauded for Bumper". Deccan Chronicle. 16 July 2023.
Cinematographer Vinoth Ratnasamy is soaking in some well-deserved praise for his compelling visuals in the recently released movie Bumper. Vinoth's previous works include MGR Magan, Aalambana and Nedunalvaadai – the last mentioned earned him several awards.
- ^ "Sasikumar‑Mirnalini Ravi's 'MGR Magan' censored with a clean 'U'". The Times of India. 28 August 2020. Retrieved 18 July 2025.
External links
[edit]- ^ AS (16 July 2023). "Vinoth Ratnasamy lauded for Bumper". Deccan Chronicle. Retrieved 20 July 2025.
Cinematographer Vinoth Ratnasamy is soaking in some well-deserved praise for his compelling visuals in the recently released movie Bumper. The film, which revolves around Kerala's bumper lottery, received wide appreciation for its gripping narrative, and Vinoth's striking imagery is being hailed as one of its key strengths...