Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative music

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Alternative music Rock music portal This page is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.

Welcome to the discussion page of the Alternative music WikiProject!
	Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
To start a new discussion section, please click here Shortcut WT:ALTMUSICWT:ALTMUSIC User script to detect unreliable sources Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.) and turns it into something like John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}. The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed. Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable. - Headbomb {t · c · p · b} This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] FAR for Monkey Gone to Heaven I have nominated Monkey Gone to Heaven for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 03:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply] Good article reassessment for Jimmy Chamberlin Jimmy Chamberlin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply] Requested move at Talk:Bigbang (Norwegian band)#Requested move 16 February 2023 There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bigbang (Norwegian band)#Requested move 16 February 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 2pou (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply] Good article reassessment for Henry Rollins Henry Rollins has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply] Feedback on draft for "505" I submitted a draft for "505" by Arctic Monkeys, but reviewers haven't gotten around to it (probably due to the 3,271 other pending submissions). The song (I think) has a pretty alternative sound, and the rock music WikiProject is kind of inactive. The draft template says to go to one of these, so if any reviewers want to view the draft, here is the link. Sincerely, Dontuseurrealname (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply] Good article reassessment for Lazer Beam Lazer Beam has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] Discussion at Wintersleep There is a discussion currently ongoing at Talk:Wintersleep in regards to a section about band members. Some input from this WikiProject would be appreciated. The discussion is Band members section. Thank you. HorrorLover555 (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] Good article reassessment for In Bloom In Bloom has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] Good article reassessment for Lithium (Nirvana song) Lithium (Nirvana song) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply] Discussion at Talk:Oasis Live '25 Tour#Discussion on Joey Waronker as either a band member or additional musician You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Oasis Live '25 Tour#Discussion on Joey Waronker as either a band member or additional musician, which is well within the scope of this WikiProject. HorrorLover555 (talk) 02:58, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply] Good article reassessment for Black Holes and Revelations Black Holes and Revelations has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:22, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]