User talk:~2025-30597-01

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 13:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@User:LuniZunie thanks! but i prefer to stay unregistered on principle — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-30597-01 (talk)
@~2025-30597-01 Understanable =) I have requested a CV revdel on the revision. Thank you for your diligence! – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 13:25, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

[edit]

Stop icon Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia without their explicit permission, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information that appears to be about another user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy whether or not that information is correct. Wikipedia's policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors will result in being blocked from editing. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsjaffe i apologise! i thought that was allowed for public figures.
Could you also redact https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ChronoEditor1&diff=prev&oldid=1326194661 please? thank you ~2025-30597-01 (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. See WP:COIVRT for instructions on how to confidentially report this coi. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i don't think i should, this is weak evidence and i think that the circumstancial evidence i've provided that doesn't OUT someone is good enough to prove that there is COI at play. ~2025-30597-01 (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That’s a good approach. Thank you for taking this seriously. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]