User talk:Viking3779

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Viking3779! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Folkezoft (talk) 17:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hagar Township Shootout (May 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:16, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I cited around 15 different reputable news articles and interviews about this incident. How is this not enough "significant coverage"?
Thanks 74.93.58.189 (talk) 14:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please let me know what sources would be better. I've reviewed the policies and news articles are considered reputable. Especially when there are several different articles. Viking3779 (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there is a better "reputable" source than the actual police body camera footage of this incident that is linked as source/notation #4 and the actual news interview of the officers involved talking about it(see notation #6). Viking3779 (talk) 15:10, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is considered original research, since the sources are primary, which is generally discouraged. GoldRomean (talk) 15:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hagar Township Shootout (May 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GoldRomean (talk) 15:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Viking3779! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 15:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]