User talk:Vaibhav Delight

Vaibhav Delight, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vaibhav Delight! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Khurram Nagar, Lucknow moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khurram Nagar, Lucknow, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ajanta Hospital & IVF Centre

Hello, Vaibhav Delight,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Ajanta Hospital & IVF Centre for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a consensus decision to be unsuitable for inclusion.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Khurram Nagar, Lucknow

Hello, Vaibhav Delight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khurram Nagar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ashiyana, Lucknow

Hello, Vaibhav Delight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashiyana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Learning management system have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Talk/Contribs 10:21, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vaibhav Delight. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vaibhav Delight. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vaibhav Delight|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 11:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobby,

I am neither an employee at ProProfs, nor being directly or indirectly being compensated by the brand. I am creating this on the request of a friend who is one of the owners. I have not included anything promotional in the content, although ProProfs has been a known brand since the last 15 years. However, if you think there's anything promotional, I am ready to take it down. Please let me know how I can take this forward. Vaibhav Delight (talk) 14:28, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Slgrandson. An edit that you recently made to Draft:ProProfs seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See previous EL-related comments from the AFC team. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 01:58, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ProProfs (September 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Your draft is highly promotional and in my opinion is borderline on whether or not it should be deleted outright. Future revisions should follow relevant policies and guidelines on paid editing and neutral point of view. For starters: Wikipedia does not care for a bolded list of products and services on an encyclopedic article, that instead only belongs on a company website. Please fully read and respond to the notices on your talk page.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 11:42, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

({{Ping|Bobby Cohn}})

Hello Bobby,

Thank you for reviewing my draft and for the detailed feedback. I understand your concerns about promotional tone and the product-list format. I will work on revising the article into a more concise, neutral history-based draft that only highlights coverage from strong independent sources (e.g. The Next Web, TechRadar, Wall Street Journal, CBS News, VentureBurn), and remove the product catalogue style.

I appreciate the guidance and will reframe the content to better align with WP:NPOV and WP:ORG. If you have any further suggestions on structuring the article so that it better meets notability expectations, I’d be grateful.

Thanks again,

–– Vaibhav Delight Vaibhav Delight (talk) 04:28, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, to clarify, I am not receiving any payment or compensation from ProProfs or any related party for these edits. I am editing as a volunteer. I will make sure to follow WP:NPOV and avoid promotional style going forward. Vaibhav Delight (talk) 04:31, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ProProfs (September 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Given the number of dead links, I'm curious if you used an AI chatbot to generate these drafts. Of the coverage that I was able to find to exist, I still don't think this organization meets or inclusion criteria for notability as an organization.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 11:24, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ProProfs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ProProfs, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
The page exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (LLM) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aydo h8^{[what have I done now?]} 23:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]