User talk:Urayahahah

November 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to RPK-74N have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: RPK-74N was changed by Urayahahah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973858 on 2025-11-01T10:11:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at RPK-74M. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: RPK-74M was changed by Urayahahah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975221 on 2025-11-01T10:11:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Mozilla Corporation into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 10:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please note that indiscriminate collections of gallery images are not allowed. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Criticism of Mozilla has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Criticism of Mozilla. Thanks! Wikishovel (talk) 06:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Criticism of Mozilla (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Criticism of Mozilla Corporation instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Criticism of Mozilla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urayahahah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Draft:Criticism of Mozilla by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Criticism of Mozilla Corporation. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Mozilla Corporation

Hey there. I think rather than have the main article for the notable events sub-section be Criticism of Mozilla Corporation, it'd make sense to have a smaller section on the page (e.g. 'Criticism') with a summary of the criticism article. The main article template is typically used for sections that are entirely covered by another page Viv Desjardin (talk, contrib) 18:24, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of QN-202 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article QN-202 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QN-202 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed reversion of redirects

There is a formal process for discussion of redirects which we expect users to follow. Please do not revert further without discussion. 23:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC) ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]