User talk:TimeToFixThis

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samantha Steele (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Patrick Goodman

[edit]

Hello Paora TimeToFixThis, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Patrick Goodman, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Goodman.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GTrang}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GTrang (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abby Palmer Cox moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Abby Palmer Cox. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Children Will Listen (šŸ„ talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing all that. I have corrected the neutrality and promotional sounding parts of the page, and have gutted the bloat out of it. TimeToFixThis | šŸ•’ 01:53, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abby Palmer Cox page issue

[edit]

Hello, I'm ChildrenWillListen. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Children Will Listen (šŸ„ talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:02, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TimeToFixThis: What this means is that you can't use ChatGPT or other large-language models to edit Wikipedia. Even things like proofreading have to be done manually to make sure things aren't being made up. The AI also made the article promotional, and articles in Wikipedia have to be neutral as possible. Children Will Listen (šŸ„ talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:07, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for bring this to my attention. That was a sloppy edit on my part. I usually am pretty good on that. Apologies. TimeToFixThis | šŸ•’ 01:51, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abby Palmer Cox (September 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:
The subject is clearly notable and I think the wording is not too promotional (it could be toned down at a couple of points but that is simple editing, not sufficient to decline the article). My concern is that the citation is nonstandard. Please use the reflist format for citations, rather than footnotes. Once that's corrected the article will be ready for mainspace. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:12, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:12, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TimeToFixThis: Apologies your message on IRC was missed. I have added the reflist for you now. Please resubmit
@WeirdNAnnoyed: If that was the only reason for the decline, it's very silly... you could have easily added the reflist yourself, then accepted it - RichT|C|E-Mail 07:56, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TimeToFixThis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:12, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:TimeToFixThis/sandbox6, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TimeToFixThis/sandbox6 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TimeToFixThis/sandbox6 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]