User talk:TheNewMinistry
TheNewMinistry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I acknowledge that I should not have thanked Aesurias (talk · contribs) repeatedly several weeks ago, as seen on their thank log. I was doing so sarcastically because I was frustrated with the NPOV case they opened against me on October 9, 2025. However, my site block today by administrator Tamzin (talk · contribs) is completely unnecessary - I openly admitted that I thanked Aesurias today for an edit they made on administrator Asilvering (talk · contribs)'s talk page. I was sincerely happy that they were contributing more material for my case that I was building against them. Aesurias asked to speak to Asilvering on an offsite Discord yesterday in the Talk Page thread they started about me and then Asilvering gave me a warning an hour later without either user discussing it onsite. That is a clear violation of Wikipedia:Discord policy on off-wiki conduct, which states: 'Consensus is reached through on-wiki discussion or by editing. Discussions elsewhere are not taken into account. In some cases, such off-wiki communication may generate suspicion and mistrust.' Tamzin, who implemented my site block, likened this to me forming a conspiracy - but it's very clear what had happened. I did not trust Asilvering to handle my WP:AE case against Aesurias without bias, so in response I asked Asilvering to recuse themself. As an alternative to the site block, I would happily accept the Interaction Ban proposed by Sennecaster (talk · contribs) that would prohibit me from contact with Aesurias. I look forward to getting back to editing and away from this drama. Thanks for reading! TheNewMinistry (talk) 08:34, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to stop with the misuse of the Thank button, and your justification is utter nonsense. You are not ready to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The article Rodney Hawkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. The only WP:RS coverage is a quick write up in a high school sports section about his college commitment. Other refs consist of game reports, college website bios, social media, and transaction/alumni lists.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
The article Pierre Sow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. Not a single reference is WP:SIGCOV from an WP:RS source. Other refs include multiple social media posts, the website to his freelance videography company, the website to his mom's workplace, and his backstage freelance listing.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. GPL93 (talk) 13:48, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
The article Quran DuBois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. The only WP:RS coverage listed is possibly a high school game report in a local newspaper, where even then the mention is as part of a "quartet" of players on his high school team. Other refs consist of 2 passing mentions (a one-time mention in an article about his semi-pro team being in the regional playoffs and a listing of all-league players from that semi-pro league), social media posts, online profiles, a Western New York high school basketball blog that is self-published (where he is also part of a listicle), and his player bio/game reports/and press releases from SUNY Canton's athletic department while he was a player there.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. GPL93 (talk) 17:30, 20 November 2025 (UTC)