User talk:TheChosenJason

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sledding Game (September 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please remove social media sources, and database sources. We're looking for mainstream journalism sources (like Rock Paper Shotgun)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TheChosenJason! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sledding Game (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sksatsuma was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is in the right direction, although I think for notability to be established we need more reliable, secondary sources that provide in-depth coverage.

Most reviewers look for a minimum of three, however this depends on the quality and reliability of the sources.

Currently two are provided, as the steam page would be considered a primary source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
sksatsuma 15:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]