User talk:Swhecon

Welcome!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Swhecon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 07:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corinne Low (August 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:
This article is about a notable subject but is excessively cited, and many of the citations are to the subject's work (i.e. non-independent). It is acceptable to have only one source for a non-controversial statement. For example, the "reproductive capital" citation should only cite current Ref. 3, since this is independent of the subject, and the 5-reference citation stack after "negotiation" should be narrowed down to one or two, ideally secondary sources mentioning Low. It's fine to cite the subject once or twice but try to keep it to a minimum. This is admittedly a nitpicky reason for a decline, but with some sourcing cleanup the article should be all set to go, as the subject is definitely notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback---I'll integrate those edits before resubmitting. Swhecon (talk) 21:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Swhecon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corinne Low (August 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RangersRus were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]