User talk:SomeoneDreaming

  1. Home
  2. Wiki


Women in Red August 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
Hello

In appreciation of your valuable work on Wikipedia, I have translated the article about Eme Eyzaguirre it into Persian and published it in the Persian Wikipedia.

You can find it here: https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/اِمه_ایزاگیری

With respect and best wishes, Shahnamk (talk) 23:25, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar! And for translating this article! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 01:58, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories added want to eliminate orphan page

[edit]

M. Ali Pasha many categories has been updated. You are requested to check if more suggestion or improvement required. Jasminelauren791 (talk) 17:59, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Updated! But I don't think that adding categories will de-orphan a page. Ideally, we'd want to link the article from other articles. I think Wikipedia:WikiProject Orphanage has more info if you're interested !SomeoneDreaming (talk) 18:03, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thanks Jasminelauren791 (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Deletion discussion about Eme Eyzaguirre

[edit]

Hello SomeoneDreaming, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Eme Eyzaguirre, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eme Eyzaguirre.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vgbyp}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vgbyp (talk) 10:28, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Richard Desmond on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 16:30, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tet Offensive on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 08:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

could you clarify? no copyright violation on Tidarren. Sarefo (talk) 22:19, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took it from Dippenaar, which is cc-by. so if I ref them, it should be fine, right? Sarefo (talk) 22:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
actually, let me investigate for a minute. this might be from an earlier revision by someone else. I just want to make sure we're not messing this up. Sarefo (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
nope, it's paraphrased from Dippenaar (2021). So I reverted it for now. If you disagree, let's sort it out here first, thank you :) Sarefo (talk) 22:24, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, thank you for reaching out! I was actually writing on your talk page when I got your message that you were here. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 22:24, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, we're both working too fast ;) Sarefo (talk) 22:27, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I do see the attribution templates on the description and taxonomy sections, so I'll restore those. I don't see one on the life style section, and it's looking like it comes from https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930600940993 ? SomeoneDreaming (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I took it from Dippenaar (2021). as they are cc-by, it should not be our problem as long as I ref them, or am I seeing that wrong? Sarefo (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For the Life style section, you didn't cite Dippenaar. But if you go back and do that with the attribution section as you did for the other sections, that should be fine. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 22:27, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok, will do so. thank you! Sarefo (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]