User talk:Silver seren

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

User:Silver seren/Userpageheader


Your submission at Articles for creation: National Food Technology Institutes has been accepted

[edit]
National Food Technology Institutes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 15:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarise yourself with the perennial source list and actually read the things you cite

[edit]

On Talk:Killing of Charlie Kirk, you have recently cited Newsweek, The Canary, and The Daily Beast. These sources are all perennial. There is a lack of consensus regarding the reliability of Newsweek and The Daily Beast, while there is a positive consensus in favour of The Canary being unreliable. A BLP article absolutely should not use such sources.

Regarding the other sources:

  • The Hindustan Times article you cited does not claim that the suspect is a groyper. It only references what the writer themselves describe as "claims from unverified social media accounts".
  • The Vanity Fair article you cited is the same.
  • The Augusta Free Press article you cited has an author description towards the bottom. To quote "Chris Graham, labeled "fringe media" by the mainstream, is the founder and editor of Augusta Free Press. (...)". It doesn't even take any effort to determine they're fringe; they describe themselves as such.

I can't take this to the appropriate talk page because I'm not extended confirmed. You, on the other hand, have 48K edits. Do better. Dieknon (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't actually read the things you're responding to, Dieknon, such as this from that section, "Obviously, I don't think these are good enough sources yet for inclusion", then you shouldn't be involved in talk page discussions. SilverserenC 22:42, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're trying to argue a clearly contentious addition (that the suspect can reasonably be linked to groypers) without providing a single reliable source that's claiming more than "He dressed as a gopnik in 2018 and some social media users speculated about it". This isn't me disputing content. I genuinely believe you are unfamiliar with policy. Dieknon (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 70

[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 70, July–August 2025
  • New collections:
    • Times of Malta
    • Africa Intelligence
    • Intelligence Online
    • La Lettre
    • Glitz
  • Spotlight: Wikimania
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:15, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Silver seren and is being posted here due to a redirect.)