User talk:Shayehid

Welcome to My Talk Page

Hello and welcome! 👋

This is the talk page for **Segun Ehidiamen**. You can leave me a message here if you’d like to discuss Wikipedia editing, my contributions, or if you have feedback on my draft at Draft:Segun_Ehidiamen.

Please remember to:

Keep comments civil and constructive.
Sign your messages with `Shayehid (talk) 12:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)` (four tildes).[reply]
Start a new topic with a clear heading if you begin a new discussion.

I’ll do my best to reply as soon as possible. Thank you for visiting and collaborating!

Quick Links

User:Segun_Ehidiamen — My user page
Draft:Segun_Ehidiamen — My current draft article
Wikipedia:WikiProject Nigeria — Project for improving Nigerian-related articles
Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography — Project for improving biographies
Wikipedia:Help desk — For general Wikipedia questions

This talk page is for discussing editing and Wikipedia-related topics only. For personal or external matters, please use appropriate channels outside Wikipedia.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Segun Ehidiamen (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Segun Ehidiamen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:31, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shayehid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 15:31, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Segun Ehidiamen (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Ok, so this whole article is a bit of a mess. As currently written, it seems like two different articles smashed together, and neither of the would pass notability checks. The second article seems to be AI written, and all of the sources listed return 404 errors, so I’m guessing that they are AI hallucinations. If you really want to go ahead with getting this article approved, my advice is to delete what you have currently written completely, and then start again from basics. Using reliable, independent secondary sources which talk directly and at length about Ehidiamen, and only putting information in the draft that you can directly source and cite from those independent secondary sources. Good luck 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Segun Ehidiamen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]