User talk:SepticMind

This is SepticMind's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniele Guglielmo Gatti (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This seems to be like a translation. Please improve and rewrite the prose to match the encyclopaedic writing style of the English Wikipedia. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniele Guglielmo Gatti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SepticMind! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniele Guglielmo Gatti (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lijil were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The revision appears to be simple paraphrasing of the previous text by an LLM. We don't accept articles written by AI. I'm also not fully convinced that we should have an article on the PERSON rather than on the move. I'm convinced that his solution is notable, but the sources seem to be about the solution not the person?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniele Guglielmo Gatti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 18:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SepticMind. Thank you for your work on Daniele Guglielmo Gatti. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi.. This page you created has met GNG and SNG guidelines. However, I'm concerned about the image's copyright (the image you've gotten probably from this page [1]). Kindly confirm the image's copyright before I mark the page as reviewed. If you are the owner of the image, or the site is copyright-free or is from public domain?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 16:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SepticMind, check here [2] for more info about image copyright. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 16:58, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Bash007: Hi again, thanks for your patience.

To clarify:

No, the image is not in the public domain, nor does it have a clearly stated free license on the ARVES website. Therefore, it cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

However, since the image is used only for identification in a biographical article, I will upload it locally to English Wikipedia under a non-free use rationale, using the tag {{Non-free biog-pic}}.

This is compliant with Wikipedia's fair use policy, and I will ensure all requirements are correctly filled.

Thanks again for your help and guidance! SepticMind (talk) 18:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, do that pls. You are always welcome Uncle Bash007 (talk) 18:02, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UncleBash, I’ve uploaded the image Daniele_Guglielmo_Gatti.jpg locally with the proper {{Non-free biog-pic}} tag and attached the non-free rationale. It is now visible in the infobox. Please check the page and let me know if any other adjustments are needed. Thanks! SepticMind (talk) 18:11, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Bash007 I’ve uploaded the image Daniele_Guglielmo_Gatti.jpg locally with the proper {{Non-free biog-pic}} tag and attached the non-free rationale. It is now visible in the infobox. Please check the page and let me know if any other adjustments are needed. Thanks! SepticMind (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Daniele Guglielmo Gatti.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Daniele Guglielmo Gatti.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:34, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SepticMind. Thank you for your work on Daniele Guglielmo Gatti. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congratulations and thank you for your work on this page. Your work is really appreciated. Hope you'll continue to be relentless in growing Wikipedia. Best!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 10:11, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Bash007: Thanks a lot for the support and for taking the time to review the article so thoroughly. I really appreciated your approach and your encouragement. I look forward to continuing my journey here and contributing more high-quality content. Best wishes! SepticMind (talk) 10:16, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Uncle Bash007 (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Martin van Essen

Hello, SepticMind,

Thank you for creating Martin van Essen.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article. The Krabbé sources appear to be self-published and another one is to a user-authored blog. Please add some more reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Northernhenge}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Northernhenge (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]