User talk:Sarveshh2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adgadanand Ashram (December 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See Help:Referencing for beginners on how to properly cite your sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rambley (talk / contribs) 11:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sarveshh2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk / contribs) 11:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adgadanand Ashram (December 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See my other comment on how to cite your sources. Sources are needed to back up and verify claims made within the article. A list of external links is not good enough. Many of the sources don't discuss claims in the article, either.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rambley (talk / contribs) 11:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adgadanand Ashram (December 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ClaudineChionh was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Do not submit this again until you have read Referencing for beginners and added inline citations as previously instructed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 05:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adgadanand Ashram (December 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of this draft is still uncited. Where there are citations, it's not clear what they are supporting (e.g. the citation that just follows "The Shakteshgadh fort") Citations are required to tell us where you have gotten each piece of information from — each claim should ideally have a citation to a source that backs up that information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]