User talk:Saakibrahman
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Please note that the following topic areas are also designated contentious topics:
- Post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people (WP:CT/AP)
- All living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles (WP:CT/BLP)
- Eastern Europe and the Balkans (WP:CT/EE)
Topic and page restrictions vary based on the page and topic area. Please consult the corresponding contentious topic summary pages for details. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 09:40, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pbritti (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable alumni
[edit]
Hello. Your recent edit to North South University appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the suggestion. Since Wikipedia sorely lacks separate profiles for many significantly prominent Bangladeshi figures, I will stick to the ones with pre-established wikipedia pages. Saakibrahman (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Welcome, Saakibrahman!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Saakibrahman! I'm Ozzie10aaaa, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.
You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.
If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.
Again, welcome to Wikipedia!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Ishfaqul Mazid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 9th Infantry Division. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed restriction of Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic
[edit]Hi Saakibrahman, your recent edits to the MintPress News article (Special:Diff/1290594310/1292107070) and the Talk:MintPress News talk page (Special:Diff/1292107856) violated the extended confirmed restriction of the Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic (WP:CT/A-I), and have been reverted. As stated at the top of Talk:MintPress News, MintPress News is covered under the Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic area, and you must have made at least 500 edits on English Wikipedia before you are eligible to edit in this topic area. The only exception is making non-disruptive edit requests on the talk page; your edit Special:Diff/1292107856 is a general complaint about the article and a personal attack against other editors, which is not considered an edit request. Please review the contentious topics procedure for more information. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 09:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies, but usually, there is a warning while attempting to edit an extended confirmed restriction article. As such, I mistakenly assumed that it had no protection. I suggest that there be a clear warning in that case. Furthermore, I had NO intention of attacking fellow editors. It was clearly a comment on how the article clearly violates Wikipedia's rules regarding neutrality and unbiased content. The entire article clearly dismisses the site as a left-wing source of disinformation. My humble suggestion would be to initiate a removal of contentious content as I could clearly see multiple violations of Wikipedia's core values. Moreoever, this was clearly a frequent complaint in the talk section of the article. Hence, a thorough review of the article would be most advised.
- Thank you for your time and best regards. Saakibrahman (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the MintPress News article lacked editnotices to notify editors about the contentious topic restrictions, and I've just added the ones that are applicable. Thank you for bringing up that issue. MintPress News is an article that covers many contentious topics, so I've sent you additional notifications in #Introduction to contentious topics to notify you of all of them.Please note that you are still allowed to make edit requests on Talk:MintPress News, but they should follow the considerations at Wikipedia:Edit requests § General considerations, particularly the first bullet point which states that edit requests should ask for specific changes.In Special:Diff/1292121203, the part that was a personal attack is your claim that the article "seems to have been taken over by right-wing editors", which is an allegation regarding other editors' political affiliations. Please note that Wikipedia:No personal attacks § What is considered to be a personal attack? contains the entry "Using someone's political affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views, such as accusing them of being left-wing or right-wing, is also forbidden." There are more effective ways to get your point across without commenting on editors, which is elaborated in the policy of focusing on content. — Newslinger talk 09:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your analyzing my claims. I will be sure to avoid that mistake again as I was not aware of that rule.
- Best regards! Saakibrahman (talk) 09:55, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the MintPress News article lacked editnotices to notify editors about the contentious topic restrictions, and I've just added the ones that are applicable. Thank you for bringing up that issue. MintPress News is an article that covers many contentious topics, so I've sent you additional notifications in #Introduction to contentious topics to notify you of all of them.Please note that you are still allowed to make edit requests on Talk:MintPress News, but they should follow the considerations at Wikipedia:Edit requests § General considerations, particularly the first bullet point which states that edit requests should ask for specific changes.In Special:Diff/1292121203, the part that was a personal attack is your claim that the article "seems to have been taken over by right-wing editors", which is an allegation regarding other editors' political affiliations. Please note that Wikipedia:No personal attacks § What is considered to be a personal attack? contains the entry "Using someone's political affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views, such as accusing them of being left-wing or right-wing, is also forbidden." There are more effective ways to get your point across without commenting on editors, which is elaborated in the policy of focusing on content. — Newslinger talk 09:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It commenced yesterday on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! Feel free to invite others who you think might want to contribute.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions. I noticed that you added an image to an infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks! Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Saakibrahman! Your additions to Khwaja Wasiuddin have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:52, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, got it. Saakibrahman (talk) 05:31, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:General Mahbubur Rahman.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:General Mahbubur Rahman.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:General ASM Nasim.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:General ASM Nasim.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
File:General Mahbubur Rahman.png listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:General Mahbubur Rahman.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:54, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
File:General ASM Nasim.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:General ASM Nasim.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:54, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I understand. Saakibrahman (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)