User talk:Saad Jatt

September 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Selim I have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Selim I was changed by Saad Jatt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864482 on 2025-09-03T16:35:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Western culture. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand the edit on Western culture and may consult at its talk page later. However, your edits on Yusuf al-Qaradawi are totally unjustified, I will add dozens of more sources for him being known as Qatari. If that doesn't convince you, I don't know what will! Saad Jatt, 14:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Saad Jatt The fact that al-Qaradawi had Qatari citizenship doesn't make his Qatari identity notable. See [1] and [2]. The existing lede, "... was an Egyptian Islamic scholar based in Doha, Qatar" is sufficient. As for "I will add dozens of more sources for him being known as Qatari", you shouldn't be reinstating your contested edits after they've been reverted as per WP:BRD. You've already been warned against edit warring. Skitash (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Skitash I mean, the Google Scholars result you gave itself proves that he is also notable for being a Qatari. 847 results are not non-notable. Also, I never argued that he is not known for being an Egyptian. If you saw my reply, I only said Egyptian-born Qatari or Egyptian and Qatari Islamic scholar seems to be the most suitable intro. Saad Jatt, 15:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Skitash I am expecting a reply. If you don't reply, then I would have to re-instate my edit for Egyptian-born Qatari or Egyptian and Qatari. Saad Jatt, 19:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Google Scholar results I showed reveal that much more RS refer to Qaradawi as Egyptian than Qatari. Reinstating your contested edit would signal your total disregard for WP:BRD and WP:3RR. Skitash (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I never argued that he's not Egyptian. Media outlets usually called him an Egyptian-Qatari. Do you have any argument against using "Qatari". He's literally lived for most of his life, more than 60 years, since 1961 while he lived in Egypt for around 35 years. Also, Qatari was already used in the short description before my edit. Saad Jatt, 19:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent page moves

(Non-administrator comment) Hi, I'm afraid I've had to revert your recent Tausa>Tonsa page moves as not having a consensus to do so. These are long-standing page titles, so they should be discussed (en masse if necessary) on a talk page (probably this one). You may be correct in your argument of the common name, but it is best to seek the agreement of other editors first. Therefore, you should also revert your subsequent edits to other articles as these are now incorrect. See WP:BRD on the usual chain of events. Also note that Article Titles is considered a contentious topic on Wikipedia; more about that next. Thanks and happy editing. —Fortuna, imperatrix 14:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

You have recently made edits related to article titles and capitalisation. This is a standard message to inform you that article titles and capitalisation is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. —Fortuna, imperatrix 14:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Use edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to William Lane Craig did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! ~Anachronist (talk) 00:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message! I will now give a clearer edit summary! Saad Jatt (talk) 01:20, 12 September 2025

Edit war

Can you stop engaging in edit wars? Further unreasonable reverts would be reported to administrators. LuffyDe (talk) 08:15, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Couldn't you've consulted the Talk page of the Pakistani Taliban before making a change as radical as removing a flag? Also, where do you think the other flag comes from? KashanAbbas (talk) 04:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if you want to have a discussion I'm fine with having one but I don't think this needs a discussion. The current flag is sourced from TTP's media cell Umar Media (you can see here) and present at gatherings of TTP's chief Noor Wali Mehsud (you can see here and here etc.). The previous flag has never been used by the TTP before nor found of any TTP websites or leaders' gatherings. If you do have any source for that flag, I would be fine with adding it back! Saad Jatt, 14:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, where did the flag you removed even come from, and what is it doing on wikipedia? KashanAbbas (talk) 16:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue where did that flag come from. And there are several inaccurate flags present on Wikimedia Commons, this just appears to be one of those. Saad Jatt, 18:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yusuf al-Qaradawi

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Yusuf al-Qaradawi, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 04:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the world did I add my "personal analysis" here? I only cited MOS:NATIONALITY which states: "In cases of public or relevant dual citizenship, or a career that spans a subject's emigration, the use of the word and reduces ambiguity." As such, Egyptian-born Qatari or Egyptian and Qatari should be used. If you bothered to have read the article, he only stayed in Egypt, his country of birth, until 1961 when he shifted to Qatar and remained in Qatar for most of his life. I will add some sources for him being Qatari. If you keep reverting me for valid reason, I would have to report you! Saad Jatt, 14:09, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]