User talk:Rtkat3

Welcome to my Talk page! If you have any comments or questions, send them here. Below is my archive pages.

Nomination of Sorcerer Supreme for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorcerer Supreme, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorcerer Supreme (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S.T.A.K.E. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S.T.A.K.E. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.T.A.K.E. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Black Order

The appearances lists for them is missing their variant from the last episode of What If Season 2 31.205.202.159 (talk) 02:18, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ravencroft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravencroft, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravencroft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Features of the Marvel Universe

Regarding your edit here, why did you say the AfD was closed when it has yet to be? Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because when I originally visited the AFD, it appeared that someone closed it as keep only for someone to reopen it. Rtkat3 (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, because this diff is the only intermediary edit between Feb. 14 and today. I don't see that anyone actually closed it, just the most recent response. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roxxon Energy Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roxxon Energy Corporation, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxxon Energy Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alchemax for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alchemax, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alchemax until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parker Industries for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parker Industries, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Industries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iron Spider for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iron Spider, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Spider until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tweedledum and Tweedledee (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tweedledum and Tweedledee (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tweedledum and Tweedledee (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:15, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phosphorus Rex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phosphorus Rex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phosphorus Rex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of DC Comics characters: A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Byrne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Unimon" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Unimon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 4 § Unimon until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

links

What the heck did you just put on the Kraven article? Do you think the readers are dumb? Of course they know what a bear and a buffalo are, you don't need to overlink it HiGuys69420 (talk) 00:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @HiGuys69420. That was to let people know what type of animals those were. The bear that killed Nikolai Kravinoff in Northern Russia had to be specific. Rtkat3 (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok the bear can be fine. But not the buffalo. HiGuys69420 (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @HiGuys69420. Buffalo takes you to a disambiguation page. Those weren't water buffaloes anyway. Rtkat3 (talk) 01:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine. But it has to be a specific one HiGuys69420 (talk) 01:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Mike Allen 23:56, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you restored that garbled mess the IP users keep adding. I added the source that states who wrote the film. You are not helping by restoring unsourced content. Mike Allen 23:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @MikeAllen. I was working on correcting the cast list order of Gabby's Dollhouse: The Movie when an edit conflict happened and caused some confusion there. Rtkat3 (talk) 00:12, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Winkie Country for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winkie Country, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winkie Country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Munchkin Country for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Munchkin Country, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munchkin Country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gillikin Country for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gillikin Country, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gillikin Country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nova Corps for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nova Corps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova Corps until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:02, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More sources were added to this one, hopefully that is enough to save it. BOZ (talk) 02:46, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my response to @BOZ. If you want to voice your keep on the article, also let those on that AFD know about that as well. Rtkat3 (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Doombot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doombot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doombot (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:05, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 27 § Alternative Whispy Woods names and unhelpful lists until a consensus is reached. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Correcting a link"

Hi,

I noticed a number of edits you've made recently in which you replaced a simple redirect of the form [[Sue Storm]] with a piped link of the form [[Invisible Woman|Sue Storm]]. In general, this isn't recommended. Please see WP:NOPIPE, MOS:NOPIPE, and WP:NOTBROKEN:

N [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]]

Y [[Mozart]]

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:13, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @Jean-de-Nivelle. If you are talking about the surname for Storm, that correction comes as a side effect of the Move+ tool that everyone uses when it comes to correcting things like comic book names. Rtkat3 (talk) 02:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In a number of cases ([1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9], etc.) you've replaced a simple redirect with a piped link, as I described above. If you look at the redirect page for Sue Storm you'll see "Do not replace these redirected links with a link directly to the target page."

In the case of the Storm (surname) page, the edits you made resulted in nonsense: "Human Torch, or the Human Torch" ... "Invisible Woman, or the Invisible Woman".

If the tool you're using is introducing errors, it's your responsibility to check your edits and fix them. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 11:07, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One Piece movie characters

Regarding the question you asked on my Talk Page, I think we could add a section at the end of the article called "Movie-exclusive characters", adding subsections for "Movie 1", "Movie 2", "Movie 3"... with the heading "These characters are exclusive from [Movie Title]:".
I also think that an "Anime-exclusive characters" section could be added, adding sections for anime-exclusive places or groups (also moving the "Ruluka" subsection that is currently in the article there, to separate it from the places that are canon to the manga; and maybe an "Anime-exclusive Navy members" subsection as part of the groups for that section, as is the case of Rapanui Pasqua who is currently included in the list). - BrookTheHumming (talk) 03:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of characters in The Loud House franchise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of characters in The Loud House franchise, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in The Loud House franchise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robotman (Robert Crane) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robotman (Robert Crane), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robotman (Robert Crane) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Ties That Grind

Hey! I notice you've once again added similar details to a previous bold edit to the plot section of the Ties That Grind article and while they are appreciated, most of the additions are trivial to the plot or simply jokes. They also push the plot summary over 400 words, which goes against the manual of style. Please do not further edit the plot summary to add these details. Thank you! IzzySwag (talk) 21:24, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of White Dragon (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Dragon (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Dragon (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yue🌙 23:40, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Section on artificial planet page.

Hello, a recent edit you've made on the "artificial planet" article in the "functional purpose" section appears suspiciously like AI writing. Could you either confirm you did not use AI to assist this, or take it down? Smoceany2 (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @Smoceany2. I did not use the AI writing when making some corrections and adding other artificial planet examples. Rtkat3 (talk) 02:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, upon further inspection on the edit history I fully believe you. Smoceany2 (talk) 03:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @Smoceany2. You're welcome. Rtkat3 (talk) 03:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very good episode summaries!

Hello! I noticed you wrote summaries for almost every episode of Electric Bloom! I just wanted to say good job and thank you for your service! :) I tried writing for the episode "How We Pulled a Song Out of Our Pocket", but it ended up being too long, so I appreciate you tweaking it.

Have you considered writing episode summaries for Vampirina: Teenage Vampire? I wrote a few and the one I wrote for the first episode was way too long that someone had to trim it down. I also wrote summaries for episodes 3 and 4, but they aren't nearly as good as yours. I see that you have made a few edits on that page. You are always welcome to tweak them and of course, add your own summaries for other episodes if you are interested. Have a nice day! Cqntralls (talk) 05:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a late response to @Cqntralls. Here's how I can help you out. If you want to write episode summaries, you got to try to keep it to the good parts like I had to do with The Thundermans: Undercover. The length of what you tried to do that ended up long would be better off at the Fandom websites. What do you think? Rtkat3 (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]