User talk:Reshmaaaa

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome, Reshmaaaa!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies on a blue and white striped plate. The plate sits on a beige surface.
Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Reshmaaaa! I'm Liance, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! ~Liancetalk 23:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear.Reshmaaaa (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

[edit]

Please disclose any prior Wikipedia accounts you have edited from. CNMall41 (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CNMall41, I have been editing from IP prior to making a Wikipedia account. I have no other account. Reshmaaaa (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Reshmaaaa. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Woh Aik Pal, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Reshmaaaa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Reshmaaaa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On what basis you're claiming it? Kindly talk with a concrete evidence. I'm gonna take this to WP: Noticeboard. Reshmaaaa (talk) 04:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aapa Shameem (March 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gheus (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Reshmaaaa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gheus (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aapa Shameem (May 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, Can you please elaborate why the article is rejected. Since it incorporates multiple references citing the impact of the show and it's cast. Please enlighten me in case I'm missing something here! Thanks and Regards, Reshmaaaa (talk) 18:04, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aapa Shameem (May 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judwaa (TV series) (June 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are not reliable or enough to show how this is notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 19:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aapa Shameem (June 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiMentor01 (talk) 04:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tark e Wafa (June 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
BOL and Reviewit are not reliable sources so should not be used. The other sources are ARY which is a primary source and not independent. Others are episode/series summaries with the only critical commentary from Dawn but it's only two sentences so no in-depth. S0091 (talk) 16:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 16:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aapa Shameem moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Aapa Shameem. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CNMall41, you rather take it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion because I feel it does meet the Wikipedia:Notabilityto be on Wikipedia. I'd like to defend my case with this article. As I feel, I've incorporated reliable sources (both, local and international) therefore, I'm moving it to the article. You may find it Wikipedia:Disruptive editing but I'd request you to open an AfD on this one as I'd like to know other editors opinions as well. Hugs and blessings to you, thanks. Reshmaaaa (talk) 19:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Aapa Shameem, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. This has been declined five times now. It does not belong in the mainspace. CNMall41 (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aapa Shameem for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aapa Shameem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aapa Shameem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Aapa Shameem. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. A deletion closed based on a keep vote that likely would have been delete had that vote not been counted is. It also closed as no consensus so until a consensus can be made, it still is unknown. Likely go back to AfD shortly. CNMall41 (talk) 01:09, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aapa Shameem for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aapa Shameem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aapa Shameem (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Reshmaaaa! Your additions to Mubarak Ho Beti Hui Hai have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:01, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatima Feng (July 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Diva and Fuchia are NOT reliable sources. You also added an entire reception section that is mostly not sourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 20:50, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baray Bhaiya moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Baray Bhaiya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Khaie (TV series). When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Reshmaaaa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Reshmaaaa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Reshmaaaa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:09, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Ivanvector, Hope you are doing great. The only reason I have been working on Wikipedia is due to my interest in research and media industry. Since I belong to Pakistan, my prime focus is improving referencing with regards to television here. There are multiple unrealible sources being used, if you'll have a look at my contributions more or less it consists of removing or adding better sources with respect to television. If I'd have been a paid editor, I'd have focused on editing articles for a specific network or artist, infact I have worked on Mexican television shows as well here. Yes, I agree my tone could have been promotional due to weak story telling and awareness of grammar, but I'll take care of it onwards. Apologies for it. Reshmaaaa (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Sher (TV series). Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. qcne (talk) 19:37, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reshmaaaa, thank you for your contributions. Saw a page created by you, about TV series Parwarish. Just a concern, is the information extracted out using ChatGPT or any similar AI chatbots? No offence, but I see there is plenty of factually misinformation inside it. And the readability tone does not seem encyclopedic. In case, you should be aware of this policy, WP:LLM. Hope you can rewrite it with better effort, thank you! M. Billoo 01:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can have some quick guidance from here:

Thank you! M. Billoo 01:36, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also be sure the sources you are using support the content. I have cleanup three or four articles now, including this one. S0091 (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Few things that I have noticed; your edit summary where you claim the content is "not AI generated", but a brief comment is present under #Khaie moved to draftspace section, where your editing tone is highlighted. I saw your different drafts, where the reviewers have still commented about you using AI chatbot, which potentially gives out the result in more promotional way instead of encyclopedic. And, it has a chance of mispresenting the facts, that happened at Parwarish#Cast, (more precisely the cast description).

Although you are welcome to make contributions, you need to extract out the content and write it down neutrally on your own in a helpful encyclopedic way. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sher (TV series) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Sher (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:39, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sher (TV series) (August 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 19:32, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khaie moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Khaie. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and and is written in a very promotional, informal way. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. qcne (talk) 19:35, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, Can you please specify where does it seems to be promotional, even though I have myself tried to compose the cast and character section and plot? If specified, it'll help me to address the issue. Apologies for Draft:Sher (TV series), after I read the article thoroughly, I realized it seemed promotional, though I have tried to make it from neutral point of view now.Reshmaaaa (talk) 20:18, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Reshmaaaa. The entire thing is full of non-neutral language. rugged, brutal, horrifying, archaic, strong-willed, longtime adversary, ruthless, power-hungry, threat, peaceful overture, joyous, brutal, surprise attack, murdered in cold blood, broken, traumatized, voiceless, forcibly, symbol of conquest, transformation, hardened, grief, represses, sorrow, rage, silently vowing revenge, intelligence, courage, emotional endurance, slow-burning, manipulates, strategic, conviction, singular, tribal tyranny, calculated, shakes the foundations, downfall, justice, silenced victims, surprising, poignant twist, hopeful future, resilience, empowerment, survivor, transformed, redemption, volatile, massacre, resilient, brutal, resilient, outspoken, crucial role, suppressed female voice, politically aware, violent ambitions, tyranny, staunch traditionalist, unwavering loyalty, dissent, betrayal, strong-willed, struggle, injustice, pivotal, vengeance journey, rising, cunning, wildcard, spirited, emotionally intelligent, progressive, thoughtful, symbolizing potential for change, principled, courageous, brutality, restore justice, tragic, innocent, hopeful, deepens resolve, principled, courageous, tyranny, fiercely loyal, brutal agenda..... qcne (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, will try to re-write from neutral view. Thanks, much appreciated.Reshmaaaa (talk) 21:18, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sher (TV series) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sher (TV series). Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:49, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sher (TV series) (August 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs to be rewritten and ensure source to text integrity. I cleanedup some but needs a more thorough check. S0091 (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jaan-e-Jahan moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jaan-e-Jahan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jaan-e-Jahan moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jaan-e-Jahan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because See talk page. Still either uses FAKEREFs of LLM.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jaan-e-Jahan has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jaan-e-Jahan. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:ANASKHAN777 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ANASKHAN777. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  asilvering (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reshmaaaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked. There's not a proper reason and I see how all the editors tried to corner me when I have been editing serials related to Pakistani media. This is lame and I don't even feel like saying anything cause this so disgusting and unfair to me, just because I have been editing the articles related to Pakistani television, which other socks have also been worked on, I have been blocked. There is no direct connection but based on my common interests I have been blocked. Well I saw it coming cause apparently administrators and senior editors does not want articles related to television here despite knowing they meet Wikipedia:Notability, so one way or the other they manage to get the user block tagging them as Sock or LLM or similar edit interests etc. I don't even expect fair treatment here, cause sort of bullying goes around here is so discouraging. The only sane person I came across here was, User:Liz and I wish her all the luck.Hope community will be a better place someday. Please look into the matter as they have had all my contributions removed immediately after my block, seems like they set a trap on me.Reshmaaaa (talk) 21:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is nor an unblock request. Please file a proper one (be mindful of WP:NOTTHEM) or you risk losing access to this Talk Star Mississippi 17:38, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not sure as of now what is the actual sock history of Anaskhan, so no comment there. You maybe right for creating pages thinking WP:N, but the editing tone was not right. There is a way out, and it is clean discussion and try to improve what the other users are identifying as fault, instead of submitting the drafts again and again within short span of time. I am not here to create trouble, please consider this as a humble advice. You can go through different established articles to study the tone in which they are written. I have also linked some common policies in a thread above. Thank you! M. Billoo 23:17, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is not about that, I'm feeling discouraged. Just because I over lapped with some socks, I have been constituted as a sock. I asked for undeletion of Draft:Fatima Feng because I found a BBC news article about the show, and I found the subject interesting as it is Pak-China Collaboration project. But in contrary, they've associated me with some sock who had contribution in that article. If that would have been the case, why would I ask for undeletion of this specific article. Other subjects listed in SPI like Khaie, Jaan-e-Jahan and Sher are critically acclaimed shows. Anyone from Pakistan would know the popularity of these series. In that case also, they have accused me for it. Anyways, I have no interest with arguing with the people here. At the end they will get you block somehow cause you're not working on their desired articles. Appreciate your concerns though, wish you luck brother.Reshmaaaa (talk) 23:47, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you can't just block me for the editing tone. With regards to my LLM accusations, I was working on it. But this specific user, S0091, wanted me blocked. Reshmaaaa (talk) 23:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand, the same has happened to me as well. What I used to do is try to put my point on the talk pages, instead of reverting other editors or re-inserting my revision on the mainspace. If I feel my opinion is under-valued, I approach WP:3O, WP:HD, WP:VP, etc. to get outsiders' opinions before getting to conclusion. Wish for your good luck as well. M. Billoo 02:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewing admin - in addition to the discussions here about their use of LLMs, see also Draft talk:Jaan-e-Jahan. S0091 (talk) 15:34, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just for a reference, also see this: Special:Diff/1306308529/1306721254. M. Billoo 23:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaan-e-Jahan (August 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Due to UPE socking and the noted misrepresentation of sources. S0091 (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
S0091 (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]
icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reshmaaaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey administrator, I have been contributing to Wikipedia avidly but I have been blocked due to overlapping connection with a sock user Anas. The other mistake I made was LLM for which I apologized and vowed to work on it and I did on the articles which have been deleted now. Please refer to Draft talk:Jaan-e-Jahan where I admitted my mistake. Besides this mistake, I have no connection to any sock and I disclosed it earlier as well. Please look into the matter as I believe I can be one of the good editors in the future as I aim to be. Thanks!

Decline reason:

It is unclear whether you are saying you are related to ANASKHAN777 or are not. If you are claiming you are not, you need to address the problems raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ANASKHAN777/Archive. Yamla (talk) 21:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

[edit]
icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reshmaaaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

here], which was after my research on the show and i still adhere to my vote as i feel it is a notable show but i respect the way it has been processed. I read policies and have tried to understand things here but it is backfiring on me now since, i did not ask for proper help which is my mistake. 5. Overlap with Lilyput - this user have alot of contributions and my contributions are just 15% in comparison of it, and you can see its barely few contributions which are mostly improving referencing, since editors often do not focus on adding reliable sources. 6. Overlaps with SCOUT socks - My edits on Humraaz, Sukoon and Sher are all my assistance to improving references. Aapa Shameem has never been a target of SCOT socks. While i have no direct connection with the user, i have been suspected as sock of, i assure you that it is completely coincidental and kindly unblock me so that i can continue with my objective and i will meticulously look after my edits onwards. Thank you!

Decline reason:

Having reviewed the edits that raised concerns of LLM and UPE activity, if Reshmaaaa's explanations are taken in good faith at face value, they suggest a fundamental misunderstanding of core Wikipedia policies to such an extent that I don't see how unblocking could be a net positive at this time. I would recommend taking a standard offer approach, and/or considering a conditional unblock request with a voluntary topic ban from biographies of living people and television topics. signed, Rosguill talk 18:09, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Reshmaaaa (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A couple things that exhibit dishonesty. in their 2nd unblock request they mention their use of LLM but previuosly flatly denied using LLM (see also Draft talk:Jaan-e-Jahan). Above at User talk:Reshmaaaa#Other accounts they state they had been editing as an IP before creating an account, but when they made an ANI complaint they stated they "just started".
As for the linked AfD which I also mention in the SPI, they cite WP:NTV which is not often used in AfDs because it is not a guideline but it was often used by Sameeerrr, examples Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirf Tum (2023 TV series), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhabbat Gumshuda Meri (TV series) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima Feng - the latter Reshmaaaa had restored. There's also another behavior that directly aligns with Sameeerrr I can email if needed.
Other overlap with the SCOT farm not mentioned in the SPI is Parwarish and Judwaa (TV series). Parwarish was originally created by a SCOT sock, first by requesting a redirect at WP:AFC/R then shortly after another sock turned it into an article. After they were blocked, I restored the redirect then it was EC protected. After gaining EC, Reshmaaaa removed the redirect and turned it into an article again. Judwaa (TV series) was moved from draft to mainspace by Zxa123, then moved back to draft after they were blocked. Reshmaaaa updates and submits it. After it was declined, they move it mainspace after making additional updates.
Another common thing with these socks are favorable comments about Liz as Reshmaaaa does in their first unblocked request. The only direct interaction they had with Liz was at the above linked ANI [1] but aslivering kindly commented as well so is odd until you notice other socks from this farm do the same, see WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149#Nauman335 where JeanieLo states I would like to express my gratitude to User:Liz for reverting User:CNMall41 baseless allegations. (also note the comments about Khaie in that discussion) and Sameeerrr mentions Liz in the SPI about them. S0091 (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't keep arguing with you cause you are so keen to associate me with the socks. First you were associating me with Anas or something, now you're trying to associate me with Nauman etc. I don't know what's your agenda behind it, maybe you're getting paid for it as it seems. My appreciation for Liz came out after she motivated me here, when I was first accused, cause she was so nice to me as I just started. Anyways, I don't owe you any explanation. I have had the worst experience of editing here and I'm not gonna comeback. Till then find someone you can associate "Reshmaaa" with, Adios.Reshmaaaa (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note: this was only a "suspected", please see my comment at SPI. No need to involve me further in any unblock discussions, but if you do find something that convinces you this isn't SCOT, I'd love to know what it was. -- asilvering (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]